1971
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-10390-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nuclear Envelope in Freeze-Etching

Abstract: ISBN 3-540-05538-X Springer·Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York ISBN 0-387-05538-X Springer·Verlag New York Heidelberg Berlin Das Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschiitzt. Die dadurch begriindeten Rechte, insbesondere die der tibersetzung des Nachdruckes, der Entnahme van Abbildungen, der Funksendung, der Wiedergabe aul photomerhaniscbem oder ahnlichem 'Vege und der Speicherung in Datenverarbeitungsanlagen, bleiben, auch bei nUT auszugsweiser Verwertung, vorbehaltenBei Vervielliiltigungen liir gewerbJiche Zwecke ist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although corresponding calculations made from thin-sectioned material gave higher values, possibly as a result of slight shrinkage of nuclei during the dehydration stage of processing (cf. Kartenbeck et al, 1971) this difference is not statistically significant (P > 0.01). Thus, pore frequency data obtained by the three methods are comparable.…”
Section: Results a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Although corresponding calculations made from thin-sectioned material gave higher values, possibly as a result of slight shrinkage of nuclei during the dehydration stage of processing (cf. Kartenbeck et al, 1971) this difference is not statistically significant (P > 0.01). Thus, pore frequency data obtained by the three methods are comparable.…”
Section: Results a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Increase of the oocyte diameter (--) and of the ooplastions tangential to nuclear envelope (cf. Franke and Scheer, 1970a,b;Kartenbeck et al, 1971). All three different electron microscopic preparative methods gave nearly identical data (for a detailed methodical discussion see Kartenbeck et al, 1971), thus allowing the conclusion that the quantitative structural data of the nuclear envelope are unaffected by methodical artifacts.…”
Section: Structural Data Of the Nuclear Envelope During Oogenesismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Shrinkage during fixation would cause a systematic error in these numbers. Freeze etching is the most quantitative method to measure density (Maul, 1977), and Kartenbeck et al (1971) compared the values they obtained in rat hepatocytes using both transmission EM and freeze etching. They found that the density of pores in thin section is larger than the density of pore in freeze etch.…”
Section: Density Of Pores In the Nuclear Envelopementioning
confidence: 99%