2014
DOI: 10.1039/c4cp00706a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nuclear electric quadrupole moment of copper

Abstract: The nuclear electric quadrupole moment (NQM) of the (63)Cu nucleus was determined from an indirect approach by combining accurate experimental nuclear quadrupole coupling constants (NQCCs) with relativistic Dirac-Coulomb coupled cluster calculations of the electric field gradient (EFG). The data obtained at the highest level of calculation, DC-CCSD-T, from 14 linear molecules containing the copper atom give rise to an indicated NQM of -198(10) mbarn. Such result slightly deviates from the previously accepted s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
26
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculated copper C Q values reported here were adjusted to incorporate the more recent value of −19.8 fm 2 for Q( 63 Cu). 10 4 ] + ) = 1193.7 and 1099.5 ppm, respectively, for calculations with the 6-31+G* and 6-311+G* basis sets). The structure for [Cu(NCCH 3 ) 4 ] + is based on that determined by X-ray crystallography by Zhu and co-workers, 61 although in our case average bond length values were used, and tetrahedral symmetry about the copper atom was assumed.…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculated copper C Q values reported here were adjusted to incorporate the more recent value of −19.8 fm 2 for Q( 63 Cu). 10 4 ] + ) = 1193.7 and 1099.5 ppm, respectively, for calculations with the 6-31+G* and 6-311+G* basis sets). The structure for [Cu(NCCH 3 ) 4 ] + is based on that determined by X-ray crystallography by Zhu and co-workers, 61 although in our case average bond length values were used, and tetrahedral symmetry about the copper atom was assumed.…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, tighter p Gaussians than the ones mentioned here are not considered because they lead to numerical oscillations in analytical EFG values that are probably associated with small imprecisions in coefficients for these functions in deep core spinors. In addition, as presented in Table III, However, those p and d Gaussian functions with the largest exponents may also be the cause of significant inaccuracies in the electron correlation contributions derived from the twopoint numerical approach [28]. Thus, a comparison of the analytical and finite difference DC-HF values obtained for the EFG at gold in AuH indicated that the four tightest p and d functions must be removed from the basis of this element to provide stable numerical results.…”
Section: A Gold Basis Set Incrementmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This step is carried out with DC-HF and DC-B3LYP calculations for AuH, following a strategy outlined in our previous studies [28]. We noticed in Table III that some tighter functions are required since they cause EFG variations of at least 0.002 a.u.…”
Section: A Gold Basis Set Incrementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This analysis reinforced the conclusion that functionals available nowadays are not capable of providing a satisfactory description of these EFGs, which has been customarily pointed out in the literature. [5,14,33] . Another study from the literature that considered first-row transition metal nuclei also concluded that PBE0 is one of the best choices for such EFG calculations.…”
Section: Evaluation and Reparameterization Of Density Functionalsmentioning
confidence: 99%