1998
DOI: 10.1080/13623699808409411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nuclear arsenals and nuclear disarmament∗

Abstract: Current world stockpiles of nuclear weapons and the status of treaties for nuclear disarmament and the ultimate elimination of nuclear weapons are summarised. The need for including stockpiles of civil plutonium in a programme for ending production and disposing of fissile materials is emphasized, and the ultimate difficulty of disposing of the last few nuclear weapons discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The world was reminded of this threat when OP nerve agents were used in the 1980s against Iranian military soldiers by Iraq (Majnoon Island) and against civilians in the Kurdish village of Birjinni. The attacks produced casualties estimated by United Nations specialists to be as high as “tens of thousands” (Barnaby, 1988; Macilwain, 1993). More recently, two terrorist attacks in Matsumoto and Tokyo, Japan in 1994 and 1995, respectively, with the nerve agent sarin resulted in the deaths of 19 people and the injury and/or hospitalization of more than 6000 individuals (reviewed, Yanagisawa et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The world was reminded of this threat when OP nerve agents were used in the 1980s against Iranian military soldiers by Iraq (Majnoon Island) and against civilians in the Kurdish village of Birjinni. The attacks produced casualties estimated by United Nations specialists to be as high as “tens of thousands” (Barnaby, 1988; Macilwain, 1993). More recently, two terrorist attacks in Matsumoto and Tokyo, Japan in 1994 and 1995, respectively, with the nerve agent sarin resulted in the deaths of 19 people and the injury and/or hospitalization of more than 6000 individuals (reviewed, Yanagisawa et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%