2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nuclear architecture of NGC 4151: on the path toward a universal outflow mechanism in light of NGC 1068

Abstract: ABSTRACT We report near-infrared integral field spectroscopic observations of the active galactic nucleus NGC 4151 with archive data from the NIFS-Gemini North Telescope. We have selected best-seeing observations (≲0.3 arcsec) that, allied to our methodology of image processing techniques, show structures with spatial resolution comparable to those of the HST. The intricate outflow of NGC 4151 is revisited in light of the results found for NGC 1068, in a previous… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
(212 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of secondary driving mechanisms have been proposed that rely on the impact of gas accelerated by one or more primary mechanisms. These secondary processes include momentum or shock driving from accretion-disk winds/UFOs (Pounds & Vaughan 2011;Pounds & King 2013;Tombesi et al 2013;Mou et al 2017;Veilleux et al 2017), expansion of radio plasma or hot cocoons around jets (Greene et al 2014;Mukherjee et al 2016;May & Steiner 2017;May et al 2020;Venturi et al 2021), mechanical driving by AGN winds (Fischer et al 2019) or jets (May et al 2018), and entrainment by X-ray winds (Trindade Falcão et al 2021). It is likely that more than one process may play a role in accelerating the gas in different environments or spatial scales.…”
Section: Agn-driven Outflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of secondary driving mechanisms have been proposed that rely on the impact of gas accelerated by one or more primary mechanisms. These secondary processes include momentum or shock driving from accretion-disk winds/UFOs (Pounds & Vaughan 2011;Pounds & King 2013;Tombesi et al 2013;Mou et al 2017;Veilleux et al 2017), expansion of radio plasma or hot cocoons around jets (Greene et al 2014;Mukherjee et al 2016;May & Steiner 2017;May et al 2020;Venturi et al 2021), mechanical driving by AGN winds (Fischer et al 2019) or jets (May et al 2018), and entrainment by X-ray winds (Trindade Falcão et al 2021). It is likely that more than one process may play a role in accelerating the gas in different environments or spatial scales.…”
Section: Agn-driven Outflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in few cases, hot molecular outflows are also observed (e.g. Davies et al 2014;Fischer et al 2017;Gnilka et al 2020;May & Steiner 2017;May et al 2020;Riffel et al 2020). These results, combined with the fact that the ionised gas is usually associated with higher temperatures when compared to the molecular gas, has led Storchi-Bergmann et al (2009) to suggest that the molecu-lar gas is a better tracer of AGN feeding, whereas the ionised gas is a better tracer of AGN feedback.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AGN illumination are not aligned. This can occur if the accretion disk (to which the jet is perpendicular) and the obscuring torus (which determines the AGN illumination cone;May et al 2020;Goosmann & Matt 2011;Fischer et al 2013) are not aligned.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%