2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The novelty value of the combined use of electroencephalography and transcranial magnetic stimulation for neuroscience research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
138
2
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
9
138
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…EEG activity following single-pulse TMS (Figure 3) to the left motor cortex at an intensity required to produce a 1-mV peak-to-peak MEP amplitude (B120 percent of MT), and recorded from the CZ electrode produced recordings that were consistent with those published previously (eg, Figure 1a from Komssi et al; Komssi and Kahkonen, 2006).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…EEG activity following single-pulse TMS (Figure 3) to the left motor cortex at an intensity required to produce a 1-mV peak-to-peak MEP amplitude (B120 percent of MT), and recorded from the CZ electrode produced recordings that were consistent with those published previously (eg, Figure 1a from Komssi et al; Komssi and Kahkonen, 2006).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Arrows indicate peaks that are consistent with those published previously (eg, Figure 1a from Komssi et al; Komssi and Kahkonen, 2006). Figure 4 (a) Cortical evoked activity following single-and paired-pulse stimulation over the left motor cortex.…”
Section: Association Between Lici and Cortical Evoked Activity In Thesupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A further goal of this study was to investigate short and long-lasting tDCS effects by evaluating the time course of induced changes at~0 and 30 min after tDCS. We employed TMS-evoked cortical responses (i.e., TEPs) as a novel probe of tDCS-induced cortical excitability changes (Ilmoniemi et al, 1997;Komssi and Kahkonen, 2006;Miniussi and Thut, 2009;Miniussi et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%