2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The novelty-seeking phenotype modulates the long-lasting effects of adolescent MDMA exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(116 reference statements)
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the hole-board test is a highly effective paradigm of novelty-seeking and predicts said sensitivity in adolescent male mice, since only high novelty seeker (HNS) adolescent mice have been shown to acquire the CPP induced by a low dose of cocaine, which is ineffective in inducing CPP in low novelty seeker (LNS) mice [ 42 ]. Moreover, we have observed a higher sensitivity of HNS to the conditioned rewarding effects of low doses of cocaine and MDMA in mice exposed to cocaine [ 43 ], ethanol [ 44 ], or MDMA [ 45 ]. However, the influence of the novelty-seeking phenotype on sensitivity to the rewarding effects of cannabinoids has not been studied to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the hole-board test is a highly effective paradigm of novelty-seeking and predicts said sensitivity in adolescent male mice, since only high novelty seeker (HNS) adolescent mice have been shown to acquire the CPP induced by a low dose of cocaine, which is ineffective in inducing CPP in low novelty seeker (LNS) mice [ 42 ]. Moreover, we have observed a higher sensitivity of HNS to the conditioned rewarding effects of low doses of cocaine and MDMA in mice exposed to cocaine [ 43 ], ethanol [ 44 ], or MDMA [ 45 ]. However, the influence of the novelty-seeking phenotype on sensitivity to the rewarding effects of cannabinoids has not been studied to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, defeated mice were defined as high or low noveltyseeking (NS) according to their head-dip scores (below or above the defeated group median) in the hole board test. We have previously used this median-split analysis to study the effects of NS on the behavioral effects of different drugs of abuse (Arenas et al, 2014;Montagud-Romero et al, 2014;Mateos-García et al, 2015;Rodríguez-Arias et al, 2015, 2016. A one-way ANOVA with a between-subjects variable-Group, with three levels (Control, Defeated High Score and Defeated Low Score)-was performed for the following measures: time in defense/submission in the first episode of defeat, percentage of time in the open arms of the EPM, number of dips in the hole board, time of immobility in the TST, and grooming (frequency and time) in the splash test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El CPL es un modelo basado en el aprendizaje clásico o pavloviano, para evaluar la recompensa condicionada inducida por diferentes estímulos (Bardo y Bevin, 2000;Tzschentke, 2007). Ha sido ampliamente utilizado para estudiar los efectos de recompensa de las drogas adictivas condicionadas (Aguilar, Rodríguez-Arias y Miñarro, 2009;Yap et al, 2015;Rodríguez-Arias et al, día et al 2017), ya que los estímulos contextuales pueden adquirir propiedades apetitivas secundarias cuando se combinan con un reforzador primario (Tzschentke, 2007). Para el CPL se emplearon 12 cajas idénticas de plexiglas con dos compartimentos de igual tamaño (30.7 cm de largo X 31.5 cm de ancho X 34.5 cm de alto), separadas por un área central de color gris (13.8 cm de largo X 31.5 cm de ancho X 34.5 cm de alto).…”
Section: Condicionamiento De La Preferencia De Lugarunclassified
“…Por lo tanto la exposición a una DS repetida induciría un incremento prolongado en el tiempo del valor motivacional de la cocaína incrementándose por tanto su potencial de abuso en los sujetos estresados. Nuestros resultados confirman numerosos estudios que han demostrado que la DS en ratones adolescentes y adultos, aumenta los efectos reforzantes de la cocaína utilizando el CPL (Arenas et al, 2016;Montagud-Romero et al, 2016a;Rodríguez-Arias et al, 2015, 2017Ferrer-Pérez et al, 2018a), o la autoadministración de cocaína (Boyson, Miguel, Quadros, DeBold y Miczek, 2011;Holly et al, 2016;Newman, Leonard, Arena, Almeida y Miczek, 2018;Arena, Covington, Herbert, DeBold y Miczek, 2019).…”
Section: Resiliencia Y Susceptibilidad Al Incremento De Los Efectos Runclassified