Twenty-two Vibrio cholerae isolates, including some from "epidemic" (O1 and O139) and "nonepidemic" serogroups, were characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) by using three housekeeping genes, gyrB, pgm, and recA; sequence data were also obtained for the virulence-associated genes tcpA, ctxA, and ctxB. Even with the small number of loci used, MLST had better discriminatory ability than did PFGE. On MLST analysis, there was clear clustering of epidemic serogroups; much greater diversity was seen among tcpA-and ctxAB-positive V. cholerae strains from other, nonepidemic serogroups, with a number of tcpA and ctxAB alleles identified.Vibrio cholerae is an environmental species that has been linked with seven pandemics of cholera since 1817 (22). Approximately 200 serogroups of V. cholerae have been identified to date, with classification based on epitopic variations in the heat-stable somatic O antigens of the strains (29). In the modern microbiology era, epidemic cholera has been associated with a limited number of closely related strains in O groups 1 and 139. All such epidemic strains carry genes for cholera toxin (encoded by the ctxAB genes) and the toxin-coregulated pilus (encoded by the tcpA gene) (10,20). Recent studies have indicated that the ctxAB and tcpA genes may also be present in "nonepidemic" (i.e., other than O1 and O139) V. cholerae serogroups (7,8,9,18,23,24,26). While the genetic relatedness of O1 and O139 isolates has been well documented (1, 2, 3, 12), we know less about the genetic relatedness and phylogeny of ctxAB-and tcpA-positive isolates in other serogroups, and such data are critical for understanding why and how pandemic-causing V. cholerae strains emerge.Several molecular typing approaches, including ribotyping (28), insertion sequence-based fingerprinting (3), amplified fragment length polymorphism (17), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) (6), have been used to characterize the molecular epidemiology of V. cholerae, with PFGE reported (6, 8) to have the most discriminatory power among these methods. These techniques have less utility in defining underlying phylogenetic relationships (11). Multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE) is of value in this regard (12), although problems with band resolution and the fact that phenotypic expression of the enzyme under study can easily be altered in response to environmental conditions can adversely affect the reproducibility of MLEE results and complicate data analysis and interpretation.More recently, attention has turned to sequence-based approaches. Sequencing of a single gene (19, 31) is not optimal: because evolution occurs by a net-like process, gene trees based on a single gene may not permit accurate determination of the genetic relatedness among various isolates (15). Multilocus sequence typing (MLST), first described in 1998 (25), provides a balance between sequence-based resolution and informativeness and technical feasibility and has been used to characterize several patho...