2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2017.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The novel Aspergillus fumigatus MAT1-2-4 mating-type gene is required for mating and cleistothecia formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result the MAT1-1-1 alpha domain family gene was named simply MAT1-1 (as there were no alternative idiomorphs in this species), the MAT1-2-1 HMG domain family gene was named MAT2-1, and the novel MAT1-2-4 family gene was named MAT2-4 ( Fig. 7 ) for consistency with previous work ( Turgeon and Yoder, 2000 , Paoletti et al., 2007 , Rydholm et al., 2007 , Yu et al., 2017 ). For further background see Wilken et al.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result the MAT1-1-1 alpha domain family gene was named simply MAT1-1 (as there were no alternative idiomorphs in this species), the MAT1-2-1 HMG domain family gene was named MAT2-1, and the novel MAT1-2-4 family gene was named MAT2-4 ( Fig. 7 ) for consistency with previous work ( Turgeon and Yoder, 2000 , Paoletti et al., 2007 , Rydholm et al., 2007 , Yu et al., 2017 ). For further background see Wilken et al.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Further analysis of the MAT region also revealed the presence of a putative MAT1-2-4 gene homologue, containing one putative intron and which was predicted to encode a 242 amino acid MAT1-2-4 protein ( Fig. 7 ), as reported by Yu et al. (2017) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study has demonstrated that the MAT1‐2 idiomorph of A. fumigatus harbors an additional gene – MAT1‐2‐4 – that is required for its mating process and the formation of cleistothecia (Yu et al ., ) and, as shown here, that is increasingly transcribed upon MAT1‐2 overexpression. Given that the deduced MAT1‐2‐4 gene product does not comprise a recognized DNA binding domain, an influence of this factor on the fungal transcriptome seems rather unlikely.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…), including the pheromone precursor‐encoding gene ppgA , the pheromone receptor‐encoding genes preA and preB (Pöggeler, ), as well as nsdD , a conserved positive regulator of Aspergillus cleistothecia development (Han et al ., ; Große and Krappmann, ), and veA , a component of the velvet complex balancing development and secondary metabolism in the aspergilli (Kim et al ., ; Calvo et al ., ; Duran et al ., ; Bayram et al ., ; Bayram and Braus, ). Based on the initial RNA‐seq data, preB , ppgA and the recently identified MAT1‐2‐4 gene (Yu et al ., ) appeared to be upregulated by forced expression of the MAT1‐2 gene, while preA as well as ppgA became increasingly expressed in a MAT1‐1 ‐dependent manner. The other transcripts were missing in the transcription profiles of either overexpressing strain to be differentially expressed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%