2018
DOI: 10.1017/s1474746418000192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Notion of Family in Lithuanian and Swedish Social Legislation

Abstract: This study examines the conceptualisation of family in key social legislative documents guiding social workers in two European countries, whose welfare systems have previously been labelled as re-familialised (Lithuania) or de-familialised (Sweden). The focus is on the concept of family as delineated on three legislative levels: the constitutional level, the general family policy level, and the child welfare policy level. ‘Family’ is explicit in Lithuanian law, and the regulation of family formation and respon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Family imaginaries and practices are embedded in specific social and structural contexts, and for this study, the specific contexts are situated in Sweden and the Swedish child welfare system and secure care. As a state, Sweden offers a de-familialized framework, meaning individuals are not supposed to be reliant on family support (Nygren, Naujanienè, & Nygren, 2018). Within this framework, child welfare in Sweden has been categorized as a family service system where support of parent-child relationships and care for children are the primary focus (Freymond & Cameron, 2006).…”
Section: The Context Of Secure Care In Swedenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family imaginaries and practices are embedded in specific social and structural contexts, and for this study, the specific contexts are situated in Sweden and the Swedish child welfare system and secure care. As a state, Sweden offers a de-familialized framework, meaning individuals are not supposed to be reliant on family support (Nygren, Naujanienè, & Nygren, 2018). Within this framework, child welfare in Sweden has been categorized as a family service system where support of parent-child relationships and care for children are the primary focus (Freymond & Cameron, 2006).…”
Section: The Context Of Secure Care In Swedenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Lithuania, child protection units are separated from social work services in child and family welfare (Nygren et al, 2018;Gilbert, 2012). As observed by Anghel et al (2013), the gap between policy and practice has become extremely visible, whilst the child has become invisible or has been named as a group of "children left behind."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intentions of welfare policies are both to decrease or eliminate discrepancies in living standards between families with children and without children but also to eliminate power divisions in families by giving opportunities for women to combine family life with work life and men the opportunity to share in parenting (Ahlberg et al, 2008). Policies are individualised with few references to 'family' (Nygren et al, 2018) but are meant to ensure that individuals and families have good living conditions. At the same time, 'Individual and family [emphasis added] care' is a well-established organising concept for large parts of social welfare services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%