2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Notch ligand Delta-like 1 integrates inputs from TGFbeta/Activin and Wnt pathways

Abstract: Unlike the well-characterized nuclear function of the Notch intracellular domain, it has been difficult to identify a nuclear role for the ligands of Notch. Here we provide evidence for the nuclear function of the Notch ligand Delta-like 1 in colon cancer (CC) cells exposed to butyrate. We demonstrate that the intracellular domain of Delta-like 1 (Dll1icd) augments the activity of Wnt signaling-dependent reporters and that of the promoter of the connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) gene. Data suggest that Dl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intriguingly, the Dll1 ICD has been shown to induce Wnt reporter activity and upregulate the expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) (Bordonaro et al, 2011). MAML represents another nexus between Notch and Wnt signaling, and, in addition to its role in stabilizing Notch ICD-CSL interactions, MAML has now been shown to bind to both GSK3 (Saint Just Ribeiro et al, 2009) and Notch signaling; sFRPs bind to ADAM10, downregulating its activity and thus inhibiting Notch signaling.…”
Section: Interactions With the Wnt Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intriguingly, the Dll1 ICD has been shown to induce Wnt reporter activity and upregulate the expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) (Bordonaro et al, 2011). MAML represents another nexus between Notch and Wnt signaling, and, in addition to its role in stabilizing Notch ICD-CSL interactions, MAML has now been shown to bind to both GSK3 (Saint Just Ribeiro et al, 2009) and Notch signaling; sFRPs bind to ADAM10, downregulating its activity and thus inhibiting Notch signaling.…”
Section: Interactions With the Wnt Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cerebrovascular endothelial cells, SMADs bind to NICD and control the expression of N-cadherin by binding to CSL binding sites in the N-cadherin promoter (Li et al, 2011). Meanwhile, Dll1 ICD binds directly to SMADs and can occupy sequences within the CTGF promoter that contain SMAD binding elements (Bordonaro et al, 2011). During smooth muscle differentiation, TGF downregulates expression of Notch3 but upregulates Hes1 expression (Kennard et al, 2008), whereas in T-cells TGF requires active Notch signaling to induce a regulatory phenotype through Notch ICD/CSL/SMAD-mediated transcription of forkhead box P3 (Foxp3) (Samon et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been previously shown that like Notch receptors, DSL ligands also undergo proteolytic cleavages by ADAM metalloproteases and γ-secretase following receptor-ligand interaction releasing the L igand I ntra c ellular D omain (LICD) (Bland et al , 2003; Bordonaro et al , 2011; Hiratochi et al , 2007; Ikeuchi and Sisodia, 2003; LaVoie and Selkoe, 2003; Qi et al , 1999; Six et al , 2003; Zolkiewska, 2008). If these endoproteolytic fragments can survive the N-end rule degradation machinery, they would be generated in RBPj msx2LOF , but not in PS msx2LOF .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane-bound Notch is physically associated with unphosphorylated β-catenin in stem and colon cancer cells and negatively regulates post-translational accumulation of β-catenin protein by altering the endocytic adaptor protein Numb and lysosomal activity (14). Bordonaro et al revealed that the Notch ligand Delta-like 1 augmented the activity of the Wnt signaling pathway and transcriptionally upregulated the connective tissue growth factor gene and promoted cell growth in colon cancer (15). Zhu et al divided CRC into three transcriptional subtypes, and identified driver networks or pathways for each group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%