2022
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-qpvt0
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The (Not So) Simple Prediction of Enantioselectivity - A Pipeline for High-Fidelity Computations

Abstract: The computation of reaction selectivity represents an appealing complementary route to experimental studies and a powerful mean to refine catalyst design strategies. Accurately establishing the selectivity of reactions facilitated by molecular catalysts, however, remains a challenging task for computational chemistry. The small free energy differences that lead to large variations in the enantiomeric ratio represent particularly tricky quantities to predict with sufficient accuracy to be helpful for prioritizi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Free energy corrections (298 K) were determined using the quasi rigid-rotor harmonic oscillator model using the GoodVibes program with a frequency cut-off value of 100 wavenumbers. 63 The relative Gibbs free energies were automatically post-processed using the toolkit volcanic 64 to establish linear free energy scaling relationships (LFESRs), determine the choice of the descriptor variable [the relative energy of intermediate 3 , Δ G RRS ( 3 )], and construct the TOF-volcano plots and activity maps. All DFT computations were performed with the Gaussian16 (revision A.03) software package.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Free energy corrections (298 K) were determined using the quasi rigid-rotor harmonic oscillator model using the GoodVibes program with a frequency cut-off value of 100 wavenumbers. 63 The relative Gibbs free energies were automatically post-processed using the toolkit volcanic 64 to establish linear free energy scaling relationships (LFESRs), determine the choice of the descriptor variable [the relative energy of intermediate 3 , Δ G RRS ( 3 )], and construct the TOF-volcano plots and activity maps. All DFT computations were performed with the Gaussian16 (revision A.03) software package.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degree of turnover frequency (TOF)-control analysis 55 predicts TSC-D to be rate-determining. However, the small energy difference between the C(sp 2 )−H activation and RE barriers (2 kcal/ mol) is within the error expected for DFT; given that many ligand arrangements in the octahedral C and TSC-D complexes are possible and performing an exhaustive conformational sampling is not straightforward, 56 RE might, in fact, be a catalyst turnover-limiting step.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%