2013
DOI: 10.1515/flih.2013.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Northern Subject Rule in first-person singular contexts in fourteenth-fifteenth-century Scots

Abstract: The article focuses on the operation of the Northern Subject Rule in the firstperson singular in early Scots. It establishes that the first-person singular was under the scope of the NSR in the fourteenth and the fifteenth centuries, with a near-categorical operation of the Proximity-to-Subject Constraint. In addition, it reveals the strength of this constraint, which in recent literature has generally been assumed to be less robust than the Type-of-Subject Constraint. A comparison with Northern Middle English… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 4 The operation of the NSR with be in northern Middle English militates against Benskin's (2011: 172) interpretation of the NSR as necessarily involving alternation between a plural suffix that is morphologically like that of the third-person singular and a plural suffix that is not. Furthermore, the scope of the NSR has been shown to extend beyond the plural; evidence of the NSR operating in the first-person singular is provided by Montgomery (1994: 83) and Fernández-Cuesta (2011, 2014) for northern Middle English and Early Modern northern dialect, and by King (1997: 175–7) and Rodríguez-Ledesma (2013) for Older Scots. See also García-Bermejo Giner & Montgomery (2003) for instances of the NSR with first-person pronoun subjects in late eighteenth-century Yorkshire English.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 The operation of the NSR with be in northern Middle English militates against Benskin's (2011: 172) interpretation of the NSR as necessarily involving alternation between a plural suffix that is morphologically like that of the third-person singular and a plural suffix that is not. Furthermore, the scope of the NSR has been shown to extend beyond the plural; evidence of the NSR operating in the first-person singular is provided by Montgomery (1994: 83) and Fernández-Cuesta (2011, 2014) for northern Middle English and Early Modern northern dialect, and by King (1997: 175–7) and Rodríguez-Ledesma (2013) for Older Scots. See also García-Bermejo Giner & Montgomery (2003) for instances of the NSR with first-person pronoun subjects in late eighteenth-century Yorkshire English.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%