2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1554202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Normative Foundations of Scarcity

Abstract: The elevation of scarcity to the fundamental economic problem rests on some unstated normative assumptions. These include a political commitment to private property, a methodological commitment to not inquire about taste formation, and the idea that human welfare is roughly equivalent to preference satisfaction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ruffin, R.J. and Gregory, P.R. (1993, p.3), Jeffrey M. 2008, Zaman (2009) 13 Samuelson and Temin, (1976, p.3)…”
Section: The Assumptions 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ruffin, R.J. and Gregory, P.R. (1993, p.3), Jeffrey M. 2008, Zaman (2009) 13 Samuelson and Temin, (1976, p.3)…”
Section: The Assumptions 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They indicate the major economic problem is not only the scarcity of resources as postulated by the mainstream approach but is also strictly related to self-interest and human behaviour at the micro-level and allocation or distribution of resources and wealth at the macro level. According to several Islamic economists, such as Hasan and Ghazali (1992), Zaman (2009), and Karim (2001), scarcity does not create a lot of problems in Islamic economic sciences, depending on its definition and origin. These researchers further argue that the notion of scarcity has written long before the birth of conventional economics, and we can't simply reject the concept of scarcity just because it was discovered and promoted by the conventional economist, but rather we have to connect its logic to the Qur'an.…”
Section: Analysis 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And she may not even take the crumbs from his Hausman and MacPherson (2006), shows how economists routinely make ethical judgments without acknowledging them. Zaman (2012b), shows that making "scarcity" the foundation of economics involves three different normative judgments.…”
Section: Are Ethics and Morals Relevant To Economic Science?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many policy recommendations made by economists on apparently positive grounds incorporate hidden value judgements. For example, Zaman (2012a) argues that the apparently objective concept of 'scarcity' is actually based on several normative propositions. Mongin (2006) and Weston (1994) have argued that it is impossible to do economics on purely positive and factual basis.…”
Section: Moral Values and Cheatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current toolkits available to economists are not equipped to even formulate this problem, let alone study it. Change is on the way as Bicchieri (2006) and others have emphasised the effect of social norms on behaviour; and the necessity of taking norms into account in economic theory (Zaman, 2012a). However, taking this into account necessarily requires going beyond the utility maximisation framework.…”
Section: Intergenerational Justicementioning
confidence: 99%