2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3241680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Normalizing Constant in the BG/BB Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of the reduced oxygen inhibition period for EOB compared to EY, EOB should exhibit a higher Φ T compared to EY; however, the xanthene core of EOB is only disubstituted with Br, and the heavy atom effect is not as significant for EB compared to EY. Interestingly, from the ground state frontier orbitals (Figure 7E), we observed distinct intermolecular charge shift character upon excitation, evidenced by accumulation of electron density on the −NO 2 side of LUMO, which was also reported as charge transfer (CT) for EOB 105 (as it is not a typical donor−acceptor CT, 34 we prefer the term charge shift, which is used herein). This character is in principle due to the strongly electron-withdrawing −NO 2 groups distributed on a single side of the xanthene core, which results in a charge shift from Br to −NO 2 upon excitation (Figure 7E).…”
Section: Structure−property Relationship: Effect Of Halogen Substitution On Electrochemical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the basis of the reduced oxygen inhibition period for EOB compared to EY, EOB should exhibit a higher Φ T compared to EY; however, the xanthene core of EOB is only disubstituted with Br, and the heavy atom effect is not as significant for EB compared to EY. Interestingly, from the ground state frontier orbitals (Figure 7E), we observed distinct intermolecular charge shift character upon excitation, evidenced by accumulation of electron density on the −NO 2 side of LUMO, which was also reported as charge transfer (CT) for EOB 105 (as it is not a typical donor−acceptor CT, 34 we prefer the term charge shift, which is used herein). This character is in principle due to the strongly electron-withdrawing −NO 2 groups distributed on a single side of the xanthene core, which results in a charge shift from Br to −NO 2 upon excitation (Figure 7E).…”
Section: Structure−property Relationship: Effect Of Halogen Substitution On Electrochemical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…27,85−87 Similarly, the photophysical and electrochemical properties of organic PCs can be tuned by the introduction/modification of substituents on the aryl chromophore. 31,34,36,52,88 Correspondingly, changes to the halogen atoms on the xanthene aryl group lead to large differences in the photophysical and electrochemical properties of the PCs, i.e., Φ T and E 0 (PC •+ / 3 PC*) (Table 2). Despite these differences, the spectral profiles of these halogenated xanthene dyes are similar as shown by UV−vis spectroscopy of the PETRAFT polymerization mixtures (Figure 1C), while ε of the dyes at their λ max varies in the range 87000−98000 M −1 cm −1 (Table 1).…”
Section: Structure−property Relationship: Effect Of Halogen Substitution On Photophysicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15,16 More recently, organic photoredox catalysts 17 (PCs) based on perylene, 18 phenothiazine, 19 dihydrophenazine, 20 and phenoxazine 21 chromophore motifs have been developed to mediate organocatalyzed ATRP (O-ATRP) to produce polymers with controlled MW, high initiator efficiency (I* = MW theo /MW exp ), and low Đ ( Figure 1) while avoiding the possibility for incorporating metal contamination into the polymer product. 22,23 Since the seminal reports on O-ATRP, PC structural modifications, 24 photophysical characterizations, [25][26][27] solvent effects, 28 light intensity modulations, 29 and synthesis of higher-order polymer architectures [30][31][32] have been reported to advance the O-ATRP processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%