Algebra — Representation Theory 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0814-3_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Normalizer of a Finite Group in its Integral Group Ring and Čech Cohomology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(5) (Marciniak and Roggenkamp [12] and Mazur [15]) If u ∈ 1 G and u n ∈ G for some positive integer n, then u ∈ G.…”
Section: Reduction To Finite Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(5) (Marciniak and Roggenkamp [12] and Mazur [15]) If u ∈ 1 G and u n ∈ G for some positive integer n, then u ∈ G.…”
Section: Reduction To Finite Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This normalizer property (NP) has been proved in the affirmative for many classes of finite groups [1,3,5,8,9,11,12,16]. For infinite groups much less is known: Mazur [15] proved (NP) for any torsion free group and in [11] some special classes of infinite groups were dealt with.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Recall that an automorphism ρ of a finite group G is called a Coleman automorphism, provided that ρ 2 ∈ Inn(G), ρ preserves the conjugacy classes of G and the restriction of ρ to any Sylow subgroup of G equals the restriction of some inner automorphism of G. This definition was initially introduced by Marciniak and Roggenkamp [14]. All Coleman automorphisms of G form a group, denoted by Aut C (G).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus it is no surprise that Coleman automorphisms of G occur naturally in the study of the normalizer problem. Related work in this direction can be found in [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, we do not intend to go into details for this.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%