2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The normal fire environment—Modeling environmental suitability for large forest wildfires using past, present, and future climate normals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
55
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The region has experienced short intervals between recent high‐severity fires coupled with intensive timber management in this mixed‐severity fire regime area, and the likelihood of further shortening of fire‐return intervals with climate change (Davis et al. ). Even where climate is suitable to sustain dense mature forests, early‐seral and non‐forest conditions may perpetuate because of a cycle of short‐interval repeat burning and timber harvest and have dramatic impacts on biodiversity and wildlife habitats (Lindenmayer et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The region has experienced short intervals between recent high‐severity fires coupled with intensive timber management in this mixed‐severity fire regime area, and the likelihood of further shortening of fire‐return intervals with climate change (Davis et al. ). Even where climate is suitable to sustain dense mature forests, early‐seral and non‐forest conditions may perpetuate because of a cycle of short‐interval repeat burning and timber harvest and have dramatic impacts on biodiversity and wildlife habitats (Lindenmayer et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model outputs a map in which each grid cell represents the suitability for the modelled condition (i.e., type conversion) to occur, ranging from 0 to 1. In addition to its most common application, species distribution modelling (Franklin, ), this modelling approach has been successfully used to map the distribution of fire probability (e.g., Davis, Yang, Yost, Belongie, & Cohen, ), structure risk to wildfire (e.g., Syphard, Keeley, Massada, Brennan, & Radeloff, ), and ignition probability (e.g., Syphard & Keeley, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barbero et al (2015) projected that the annual probability of very large fires will increase by a factor of 4 in 2041 to 2070 compared to 1971 to 2000. Projections by Davis et al (2017) suggested that the proportion of forests highly suitable for fires >40 ha will increase by >20% in the next century for most of Oregon and Washington, but less so for the Coast Range and Puget Lowlands. The largest projected increases were in the Blue Mountains, Klamath Mountains, and East Cascades.…”
Section: Fire Projections By Empirical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%