1980
DOI: 10.2307/2684123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The NONMEM System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
760
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 697 publications
(767 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
760
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of population pharmacokinetic models for carboplatin and e toposide was undertaken using nonlinear mixed effects modeling implemented as part of the NONMEM version VI, level 1.1 software [9]. The first-order conditional estimation method with η/ε interaction was used to obtain parameter estimates together with either ADVAN1 with the TRANS2 reparameterisation, for one-compartment models, or ADVAN3 and TRANS4 for two-compartment models.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of population pharmacokinetic models for carboplatin and e toposide was undertaken using nonlinear mixed effects modeling implemented as part of the NONMEM version VI, level 1.1 software [9]. The first-order conditional estimation method with η/ε interaction was used to obtain parameter estimates together with either ADVAN1 with the TRANS2 reparameterisation, for one-compartment models, or ADVAN3 and TRANS4 for two-compartment models.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide a robust mathematical analysis, model development was performed independently in two software packages (S-ADAPT and NONMEM) which utilize different estimation algorithms. The importance sampling Monte Carlo parametric expectation-maximization method (pmethod ϭ 4) in S-ADAPT (version 1.57 [31]) using SADAPT-TRAN (32,33) and the first-order conditional estimation method with the interaction option (FOCEϩI) in NONMEM VI (level 1.2; using the ADVAN9 subroutine; NONMEM Project Group, Icon Development Solutions, Ellicott City, MD [34]) were applied. Models were evaluated based on the S-ADAPT objective function value (Ϫ1ϫ log likelihood), NONMEM objective function value (Ϫ2ϫ log likelihood), and a series of standard diagnostic plots as previously described (35)(36)(37).…”
Section: Fig 2 Mechanistic Synergy With Drug B Enhancing the Rate Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population models were originally introduced in the context of pharmacokinetic studies for drug development and evaluation (Beal and Sheiner, 1980;Beal and Sheiner, 1982;Sheiner, 1984) . A number of applications can be found in the pharmacokinetic literature (Aarons, 1992;Sheiner and Ludden, 1992;Vozeh et al, 1996;Yuh et al, 1994) .…”
Section: Population Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another classification of the relevant statistical methods differentiates maximum likelihood (Beal and Sheiner, 1980) and Bayesian approaches (Racine-Poon, 1985) . Modelling in toxicology ought to be particularly well served by a Bayesian approach.…”
Section: Bayesian Analysis Of Population Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%