2015
DOI: 10.1037/dev0000055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nonlinear relations of the approximate number system and mathematical language to early mathematics development.

Abstract: Both mathematical language and the approximate number system (ANS) have been identified as strong predictors of early mathematics performance. Yet, these relations may be different depending on a child's developmental level. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relations between these domains across different levels of ability. Participants included 114 children who were assessed in the fall and spring of preschool on a battery of academic and cognitive tasks. Children were 3.12 to 5.26 years old (M =… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
123
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
123
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A growing body of evidence has indicated that mathematical language is malleable (Hassinger-Das et al, 2015;Hojnoski et al, 2014;Jennings et al, 1992;Powell & Driver, 2014) and is a strong predictor of mathematical knowledge (Purpura & Logan, 2015;Toll & Van Luit, 2014a, 2014b, and that exposure to mathematical language is highly predictive of mathematical knowledge growth across the early years (Boonen et al, 2011;Gunderson & Levine, 2011;Klibanoff et al, 2006;Levine et al, 2010). However, there is limited evidence supporting the causal connection between mathematical language and mathematical knowledge.…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A growing body of evidence has indicated that mathematical language is malleable (Hassinger-Das et al, 2015;Hojnoski et al, 2014;Jennings et al, 1992;Powell & Driver, 2014) and is a strong predictor of mathematical knowledge (Purpura & Logan, 2015;Toll & Van Luit, 2014a, 2014b, and that exposure to mathematical language is highly predictive of mathematical knowledge growth across the early years (Boonen et al, 2011;Gunderson & Levine, 2011;Klibanoff et al, 2006;Levine et al, 2010). However, there is limited evidence supporting the causal connection between mathematical language and mathematical knowledge.…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Children were awarded one 12 point for each correct response. In prior work (Purpura & Logan, 2015), these items were selected from a larger battery (i.e., broader range) of items using an item response theory framework. The selected items had a range of difficulty parameters and strong discrimination parameters.…”
Section: Mathematical Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ANS is thought to be the foundation on which math ability builds (Verguts & Fias, 2004), although some work has found no significant relation between the ANS and future math performance (e.g., de Smedt, Noël, Gilmore, & Ansari, 2013). A meta-analysis has found that there does appear to be a small but stable relation between the ANS and math performance (Chen & Li, 2014) but this relation appears to be non-linear (Bonny & Lourenco, 2013;Purpura & Logan, 2015) with the ANS more related to earlier skills than with later skills (Chu, vanMarle, & Geary, 2015;Libertus, Feigenson, & Halberda, 2013). Given this mixed literature on the role of the ANS in complex math performance, we found it surprising that the ANS was one of the most important predictors of performance in Calculus II.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies (Mazzocco, Feigenson, & Halberda, 2011a; Piazza et al, 2010) have reported poorer ANS acuity in children with MLD, but other studies have not (Iuculano, Tang, Hall, & Butterworth, 2008; Rousselle & Noel, 2007). In preschool children, ANS acuity at the beginning of prekindergarten was found to be predictive of math achievement at the end of the prekindergarten year, but only for children in the lowest quantile of the mathematics performance continuum (Purpura & Logan, 2015). In a micro-analytic approach to studying these relations, Bugden and Ansari (2015) found that children with MLD did not differ from typically developing peers on items in which number and area are correlated (i.e., where 10 dots take up more area than 5 dots), but did differ on items in which number and area are uncorrelated (i.e., where 10 dots take up the same area as 5 dots).…”
Section: Early Numeracy Skills and Their Relation To Mathematical Achmentioning
confidence: 99%