1968
DOI: 10.1007/bf02787676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The non-linear renewal equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• 0 A Newton binomial expansion applied to the rhs integrand of (2.21) using (2.10), Theorem 4, p. 406 of [ 3] , (2.16), and that ~ ~ 1 yields that the rha of (2.21) equals…”
Section: Integral Equation and Resultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• 0 A Newton binomial expansion applied to the rhs integrand of (2.21) using (2.10), Theorem 4, p. 406 of [ 3] , (2.16), and that ~ ~ 1 yields that the rha of (2.21) equals…”
Section: Integral Equation and Resultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proceeding along the lines developed for the branching process in [3], one may, under stronger differentiability and moment conditions on h and G, refine the result of the theorem. For example, under very slightly more than the existence of h'"(0 +), and a fourth moment of G, one can show that *"'(') -Y_1r + y, logí + y2 + 0(t~y}), where y is as before, and yx, y2, y3 are constants, y, depending on h"(0), h'"(0), and p. We will not go into such refinements here.…”
Section: Hx(t)=^h(x(t-y))dg(y)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the applications, the proofs of several classical limit theorems rest crucially on determination of the rate of convergence of x(t) to L. To that end we initiated study of these rates with J. Chover [3] for the simplest branching model leading to (1), using techniques which depended on special aspects of the branching process.…”
Section: Hx(t)=^h(x(t-y))dg(y)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will be interested in the quantities P,(t) of (2.3). It seems of independent interest to give a proof of (3.3) based on the corresponding result in the one-type case given by Chover and Ney [1]. It seems of independent interest to give a proof of (3.3) based on the corresponding result in the one-type case given by Chover and Ney [1].…”
Section: Definitions and Notation (21) Definition Let Zi(t) = Numbementioning
confidence: 97%