1987
DOI: 10.1104/pp.84.3.954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nitrogen Use Efficiency of C3 and C4 Plants

Abstract: ABSTRACIThe effect of applied nitrogen (N) on the growth, laf expansion rate, biomass padtioning and laf N levels of Cheaopodium album (C3) and Amaranthus rtroftexus (C4) were investigted. At a given applied N leveL C. album had 50% greater leaf N per unit area (N.) than A. retrojkxw. Nitrate accumulated at lower N. in A. retrojiexus thn C. album. A. rctroJiexus was more productive than C. album at high N, but C. album was more productive at low N. At high appled N, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) expressed eith… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
56
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Heterogeneity in the responses of grassland ecosystems to N, CO 2 enrichment and climate change may also be attributed to different plant photosynthetic pathways (Ehleringer et al 1997). Current evidence suggests that C4 species outperform C3 plants in N-limited conditions, perhaps due to their higher photosynthetic N use efficiency, but this relationship may not hold under elevated N (Sage & Pearcy 1987;Niu et al 2008). It has also been hypothesized that C3 species should increase relative to C4 species under elevated CO 2 as a result of reduced rubisco substrate limitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterogeneity in the responses of grassland ecosystems to N, CO 2 enrichment and climate change may also be attributed to different plant photosynthetic pathways (Ehleringer et al 1997). Current evidence suggests that C4 species outperform C3 plants in N-limited conditions, perhaps due to their higher photosynthetic N use efficiency, but this relationship may not hold under elevated N (Sage & Pearcy 1987;Niu et al 2008). It has also been hypothesized that C3 species should increase relative to C4 species under elevated CO 2 as a result of reduced rubisco substrate limitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the availability of nitrogen limits growth in most environments but the restricted development of nitrogen-deficient plants is usually due to a lower rate of leaf expansion rather than a decline in rate of photosynthesis per unit leaf area (22). Evans and Terashima (6) found that the photosynthetic properties of spinach thylakoid membranes were virtually independent of nitrogen treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To get dW/dt, we need to know the relationship between total aboveground biomass and time (d; or thermal time, GDD), which can be measured or simulated. A correlation between CO 2 assimilation and leaf N content (N L , g N m 22 leaf) has frequently been observed (Hasegawa and Horie 1996;Lawlor 2002;Lindquist 2001b;Sinclair and Horie 1989) because the majority of the N in plant leaves is found in photosynthetic proteins (Sage and Pearcy 1987a). C 3 plants use ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) to initially fix CO 2 , whereas C 4 plants use phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) carboxylase (Ehleringer and Monson 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%