Labour Relations in Central Europe 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781351154444-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nine West European Multinationals: Different Patterns of the Impact on the Industrial Relations in their CEE Subsidiaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early on there were expectations that the Directive might have a stronger impact in the CEE new Member States than in the EU-15, because in the former no general regime for information and consultation had existed (for example, Donaghey et al, 2013). At the initial stage of implementation of the Directive, it appeared that trade unions (at least in Czechia, Poland and Slovakia) were sceptical towards works councils, seeing them more as competition than allies (Tholen, 2017). In general, wherever introduction of works councils into the national institutional framework was triggered directly by implementation of the Directive, they struggled to become embedded (for example, Blanpain and Lyutov, 2014; Skorupińska-Cieślak, 2023), as indicated by their limited incidence and coverage.…”
Section: Accession and Its Aftermathmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early on there were expectations that the Directive might have a stronger impact in the CEE new Member States than in the EU-15, because in the former no general regime for information and consultation had existed (for example, Donaghey et al, 2013). At the initial stage of implementation of the Directive, it appeared that trade unions (at least in Czechia, Poland and Slovakia) were sceptical towards works councils, seeing them more as competition than allies (Tholen, 2017). In general, wherever introduction of works councils into the national institutional framework was triggered directly by implementation of the Directive, they struggled to become embedded (for example, Blanpain and Lyutov, 2014; Skorupińska-Cieślak, 2023), as indicated by their limited incidence and coverage.…”
Section: Accession and Its Aftermathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debates on the ‘Europeanisation’ of industrial relations in the context of enlargement produced extremely divergent, often contradictory views. Radaelli (2004: 3) states that ‘Europeanisation consists of processes of a) construction, b) diffusion and c) institutionalisation of formal and informal rules, procedures, policy paradigms, styles, “ways of doing things” and shared beliefs and norms which are first defined and consolidated in the EU policy process and then incorporated in the logic of domestic (national and subnational) discourse, political structures and public policies.’ The spectrum of voices in the debate ranged from optimistic expectations of spillover effects from western European FDI (for example, Galgóczi, 2003; Tholen, 2017), to claims that admission of the new Member States would only result in a clash of trade union agendas (for example, Meardi, 2002) and undermine the foundations of the European Social Model.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%