2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2004.00013.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nightmare of the combination: comments on matrix representation with parsimony and its first application in biogeography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the high level congruence detected, we built a supertree in amalgamating trees from different wasp lineages. As discussed previously (Hall and Harvey 2002;Racheli 2004), supertree construction based on topological character matrices such as MRP matrix is quite similar to BPA. However, it is not interpreted in terms of lineage losses and host switches.…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Given the high level congruence detected, we built a supertree in amalgamating trees from different wasp lineages. As discussed previously (Hall and Harvey 2002;Racheli 2004), supertree construction based on topological character matrices such as MRP matrix is quite similar to BPA. However, it is not interpreted in terms of lineage losses and host switches.…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…MRP has gained popularity due to its ease of applicability, but its scientific underpinnings remain still to be discovered (Racheli, 2004). Hackett et al (1995) suggested, however, that combining trees resulting from different phylogenetic methods into a consensus tree could be misleading, because it is not clear why to give as much weight to the results of "weak" methods than to more consistent, robust, and efficient ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their analysis was based on the application of MRP (Matrix Representation with Parsimony) to construct a supertree using the available phenetic and phylogenetic hypotheses for parrots (see Munshi‐South and Wilkinson 2006 and references therein). However, the use of MRP lacks a rigorous theoretical and methodological basis, as emphasized by several authors (Gatesy et al 2002, Gatesy and Springer 2004, Racheli 2004). For these reasons, we analysed the available data on genome size according to the approach used by Gregory (2002b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%