2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06071-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nexus of fiscal policy instruments and environmental degradation in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study’s result indicates the positive relationship between economic growth and the three pollutions factors. This corresponds to [ 33 ], who clarified the linkage between government expenditure as fiscal policy proxy and environmental quality in China for the period 1980–2016. The empirical result indicates the positive relationship between government expenditure and environmental degradation with the existence of EKC hypothesis, both in the long and short term.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The study’s result indicates the positive relationship between economic growth and the three pollutions factors. This corresponds to [ 33 ], who clarified the linkage between government expenditure as fiscal policy proxy and environmental quality in China for the period 1980–2016. The empirical result indicates the positive relationship between government expenditure and environmental degradation with the existence of EKC hypothesis, both in the long and short term.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…According to prior findings, some of the main macroeconomic determinants of environmental pollution reported in earlier studies include, but are not limited to, the inflow of remittances (M. Ahmad, Ul Haq, et al, 2019), aggregate domestic demand consumption (M. Ahmad & Khattak, 2020), national income (Grossman & Krueger, 1995), foreign direct investment, energy consumption (Mirzaei & Bekri, 2017), globalization (Shahbaz, Adebola, & Ozturk, 2016), international trade (Lv & Xu, 2019), urbanization (Wang, Li, & Fang, 2018), fiscal policy instruments (Yuelan et al, 2019), population growth rate (Harper, 2013), financial development (Dar & Asif, 2017), and innovation (Khattak, Ahmad, Khan, & Khan, 2020). Beyond the factors listed above, this paper considers monetary policy as a new and unexplored factor of pollution for the following reason.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fiscal expenditures negatively affect the quality and standards of the environment by differentiating the real causes of environmental degradation in form of either consumption or production produced. Similarly, in the context of China, Yuelan et al (2019) empirically explored the positive and significant relationship between environmental degradation and fiscal policy tools (particularly expansionary fiscal policy tools). A positive and significant impact of public expenditure in both consumption 2 emission and production 2 has been explored (Muhafidin, 2020).…”
Section: Empirical Results and Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fiscal instruments are significant determinants in the USA while Yeulan et al (2019) explored the same conclusion for China which is to some extend is exact to the existing results of this research paper. Similarly, many studies have explored the symmetric impact of fiscal policies on environmental quality (Lepoz et al, 2011;Katircioglu and Katircioglu 2018;Chan 2020;Paizanos 2016 andYuelan et al, 2019) Above all, the best 20 ARDL models are given in Table 7. There are five different types of model selection criteria which are log-likelihood, SBC, HQ, AIC, and adjusted 2 .…”
Section: Empirical Results and Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%