2021
DOI: 10.1108/ejtd-09-2020-0137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nexus between diversity management (DM) and organizational performance (OP): mediating role of cognitive and affective diversity

Abstract: Purpose Present day organizations are considering workforce diversity as one of the main challenges in the human resource management. This study aims to find out the relationship between diversity management (DM) in the context of strategic human resource management (SHRM) and organizational performance (OP). An attempt is made to find out the mediation effect of cognitive diversity (CD) and affective diversity (AD) in the relationship between DM and OP. Design/methodology/approach The constructs investigate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, matters internal to the project team may affect the user resistance in the implementing organization even if the project is fully outsourced as it may affect antecedents of user resistance, such as communication and user involvement [ 3 , 17 , 21 , 22 ]. Since all three types of conflicts can affect team performance [ 24 , 30 , 35 ], including the performance of the interaction with users of developed software, we posit the following hypotheses:…”
Section: Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, matters internal to the project team may affect the user resistance in the implementing organization even if the project is fully outsourced as it may affect antecedents of user resistance, such as communication and user involvement [ 3 , 17 , 21 , 22 ]. Since all three types of conflicts can affect team performance [ 24 , 30 , 35 ], including the performance of the interaction with users of developed software, we posit the following hypotheses:…”
Section: Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like resistance to change, studies show that conflict can contribute to better project outcomes [ 28 ]. While relationship conflict is generally associated with negative consequences [ 29 ], task and process conflicts may be associated with both negative and positive outcomes depending on how they are handled [ 28 30 ]. Task and process conflicts are also commonly referred to as constructive conflict [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to some studies, organizations that became aware of this situation started to change their HRM practices by the end of the 1990s ( Kemper et al, 2016 ) and diversity management has become an increasingly important part of HRM in organizations ( Davis et al, 2016 ). Indeed, workforce diversity is one of the main challenges in HRM ( Showkat and Misra, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are findings that diversity reduces job satisfaction (e.g., Choi, 2013 ) and employee satisfaction, which refers to the extent to which employees are satisfied with their job in general or the specific facets of the job within the organization ( Dineen et al, 2007 ), and hurts the psychology of employees in general ( Taras et al, 2019 ). However, as highlighted in studies examining the positive relationship between diversity climate, diversity training, trust, and turnover (e.g., Ward et al, 2022 , Zhang and McGuire, 2022 ), the adverse effects of diversity can be compensated for if managed ( Stazyk et al, 2012 ; Showkat and Misra, 2022 ) and employee satisfaction levels can increase ( Pitts, 2009 ); minority employees may accrue benefits from diversity management activities ( Pitts, 2009 ; Ward et al, 2022 ). Some studies (e.g., Memon et al, 2021 ) indicate that the level of employee satisfaction with the HRM practices has a significant effect on the overall satisfaction level of employees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%