2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17362-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nexus between corporate environment, social, and governance performance and cost of capital: evidence from top global tech leaders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main inspection part is measured by the environmental protection investment of the enterprise, and the robustness inspection part is replaced by the sewage charge. Investigate i , t is the main explanatory variable of this article, indicating the field research of institutional investors [ 21 , 22 ]. In equation ( 2 ), X represents the indicators of enterprise environmental information disclosure (Score) and enterprise distribution concentration (Compror).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main inspection part is measured by the environmental protection investment of the enterprise, and the robustness inspection part is replaced by the sewage charge. Investigate i , t is the main explanatory variable of this article, indicating the field research of institutional investors [ 21 , 22 ]. In equation ( 2 ), X represents the indicators of enterprise environmental information disclosure (Score) and enterprise distribution concentration (Compror).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found the same as per the debt covenants hypothesis that leverage pursues the managers to opportunistically utilize the REM practices to hide the actual financial image from investors. Another study documented that sustainable reporting diminish the cost of debt (Nazir et al 2022), which may also encourage the managers to artificially make their earnings sustainable for obtaining loans at reasonable cost.…”
Section: Leverage and Earnings Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But there is a second possibility that ESG reporting is viewed as a different firm's burden, and therefore, it is a form of inefficiency. Nazir et al [19] investigated the impact of ESG performance of top global technology leading firms on their cost of capital. Panel data fixed effects and random effects and generalized method of moment (GMM) regression estimation techniques have been applied to ascertain this relationship during a period of eight years (2010-2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harymawan et al [18] (i) Investment efficiency (ii) Environmental (iii) Social (iv) Governance Nazir et al [19] (i) Governance (ii) Global technology Akbar et al [20] (i) Financial distress (ii) Corporate restructuring Ryu and won [21] (i) Innovation (ii) Value frim Khoung et al [22] (i) Life cycle (ii) Earning management Yulianto [23] (i) Frim size proxy (ii) Total sales Ahmad et al [24] (i) Life cycle (ii) Investment efficiency Akbar et al [25] (i) Capital management (ii) Profitability (iii) Market performance Yulianto et al [26] (i) Life cycle (ii) Technology information digitalization (TID) Shahzad et al [27] (i) Risk (ii) Emergence (iii) Growth (iv) Decline Ahsan et al [8] (i) Risk (ii) Maturity (iii) Stagnation Complexity nonsystematic risk is higher in the introduction and decline stages and lower in the growth and maturity stages. Also, cash flow fluctuations and information uncertainty differ only in the maturity stage from the stagnation stage, and in this regard, there is no difference between other stages of the life cycle and the stagnation stage.…”
Section: Author Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%