2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/re.2018.00-56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Next Release Problem Revisited: A New Avenue for Goal Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also plan to analyse the use of additional inter-dependencies as discussed in [Aydemir et al 2018], in order to provide even more information for the viewers of the models. Lastly, we plan to expand the visualization strategies beyond the scope of requirements prioritization and release planning -e.g., for tracking software development in terms of elements to do/doing/done.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also plan to analyse the use of additional inter-dependencies as discussed in [Aydemir et al 2018], in order to provide even more information for the viewers of the models. Lastly, we plan to expand the visualization strategies beyond the scope of requirements prioritization and release planning -e.g., for tracking software development in terms of elements to do/doing/done.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aydemir et al [Aydemir et al 2018] propose a goal-based approach for addressing the next release problem -that is, selecting which requirements to implement next, from a set of candidate requirements. They extend traditional goal trees with a set of inter-dependency constraints, such as REQUIRES (R1 requires R2 to function) and TEMPORAL (R1 needs to be implemented before R2).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this first approach is based on the problem statement in [12], it is assumed that all features are independent from each other, which is an unrealistic assumption. One possible improvement would be to combine the feature specifications with goal models, as done by Aydemir et al [27], and in this way also consider dependencies between features and requirements when searching for optimal release candidates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al develop a decision support framework METRO for the Next Release Problem to manage algorithmic uncertainty and requirements uncertainty [18]. Aydemir et al frame the Next Release Problem in terms of constrained goal models [19]. Although these papers are effective for decision making, they do not fully consider the perspective of fairness.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%