2005
DOI: 10.1021/jm040217u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Next Generation of Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors:  Structural Clues to Ligand and Substrate Selectivity of Phosphodiesterases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(165 reference statements)
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21) This process is generally under negative feedback regulation by phosphodiesterases (PDEs) that degrade cAMP to AMP. 22) Ramage et al have shown that the hyphal regulatory gene EFG1 is required for normal biofilm growth. 15,16) Surface adhesin ALS3 and hyphae specific gene HWP1 have a pivotal role in biofilm formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21) This process is generally under negative feedback regulation by phosphodiesterases (PDEs) that degrade cAMP to AMP. 22) Ramage et al have shown that the hyphal regulatory gene EFG1 is required for normal biofilm growth. 15,16) Surface adhesin ALS3 and hyphae specific gene HWP1 have a pivotal role in biofilm formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The docking study of new selective PDE4 inhibitors was facilitated by the published crystal structures of PDE4. 32,58,59) The docking results showed good correlation between the enzymatic activity of our compounds and their binding interactions as well as their Gold Fitness scores.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…6 All the ligands cocrystallized with different PDE isoforms also had a hydrogen bonding interaction with a conserved glutamine residue. 5 Molecular docking using FlexX produced docked poses far away from the active site when compared with the GOLDpredicted poses. As a representative example, a comparison of FlexX-predicted (magenta carbon) and GOLD-predicted (orange carbon) binding conformation of 23, one of the most active spiroquinazolinones, is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Docking Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,4 Among the 11 different PDE isoforms, PDE4, 7, and 8 are selective for cAMP; PDE5, 6, and 9 hydrolyze cGMP specifically; and PDE1, 2, 3, 10, and 11 can hydrolyze both cyclic nucleotides. 5 Selectivity for the substrate is determined by the ''glutamine switch mechanism.'' 6 A conserved glutamine residue present in the active site determines the selectivity for incoming nucleotides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%