2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Newman Procedure for Analyzing Primary Four Pupils Errors on Written Mathematical Tasks: A Malaysian Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
39
1
22

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
8
39
1
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Most students did not manage to solve the problems of Fraction involving the use of HOTS. The results are consistent with the study done by Singh et al (2010) in which the students fail to convert the mathematical problems into mathematical forms. The failures could be due to the teachings by teachers who do not emphasize on the comprehension and mathematical skills needed by a student and eventually affect them for failing to produce the required result.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most students did not manage to solve the problems of Fraction involving the use of HOTS. The results are consistent with the study done by Singh et al (2010) in which the students fail to convert the mathematical problems into mathematical forms. The failures could be due to the teachings by teachers who do not emphasize on the comprehension and mathematical skills needed by a student and eventually affect them for failing to produce the required result.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Out of this total number of errors, it was found that a total of 251 (20.92%) errors were caused by the fluency factors (reading and comprehension) and 949 (79.08%) errors were caused by the mathematical processing factors (transformation, process skills and encoding). The results of the study are supported by the research conducted by previous researchers namely, Singh et al (2010) and Ellerton and Clements (1996), who found that the errors caused by language fluency were the minor errors, and mathematical processing errors were the major errors made by students when answering exam questions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The findings of the research that students mostly made comprehension-based mistakes are coherent with the findings in the studies by Singh, Rahman, Hoon, (2010), Clements and Ellerton (1996), Marinas and Clements (1990), Clarkson (1991). The fact in the study that comprehension-related mistakes are too many in number shows the necessity that activities for what is read in problem solving practices should be increased and reading comprehension strategies should be adapted to problem solving practices.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Wijaya ve diğerleri (2014), Ulu (2011), Singh, Rahman ve Hoon (2010, Clements ve Ellerton (1996), Clarkson (1991), Marinas ve Clements (1990), Clements (1982), Clarkson (1980) tarafından yapılan çalışmalarda ilköğretim öğrencilerinin problem çözerken %25 ile % 75 arasında değişen oranlarda okuduğunu anlama kaynaklı hata yaptıkları bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Öte yandan Jordan, Kaplan ve Hanich (2002) tarafından yapılan çalışmada okuduğunu anlama güçlüğünün matematik güçlüğünü yordadığı fakat matematik güçlüğünün okuduğunu anlama güçlüğünü yordamadığı bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.…”
Section: Okuduğunu Anlama Becerileri Ile Problem çöZme Becerileri Araunclassified