2013
DOI: 10.1632/pmla.2013.128.1.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The New Unhistoricism in Queer Studies

Abstract: In the name of “homohistory,” “queer temporality,” and “unhistoricism,” some early modernists have accused queer historicists of promoting a normalizing view of sexuality, history, and time. These early modernists announce their critique of the “straight temporality” allegedly caused by a framework of teleology as a decisive break from previous methods of queer history. Using the accusation of teleology as an analytic fulcrum, this essay scrutinizes these scholars' assumptions regarding temporality, representa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent theoretical formulations of the nature of history pose a version of the same question. New Formalist work looks to a supple and bilateral interplay of literary form and historical context; in another critical development, "new unhistoricism," as Traub (2013) wittily describes this emergent work, asks whether the foundational focus of historicist inquiry on temporal succession is inherently problematic. Chronology, the argument goes, has bracketed out other, equally important connections among texts and contexts; as an alternative, queer theorists suggest that we be more "attentive to the recursive eddies and back-to-the-future loops that often pass undetected 28.…”
Section: Historicity and Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent theoretical formulations of the nature of history pose a version of the same question. New Formalist work looks to a supple and bilateral interplay of literary form and historical context; in another critical development, "new unhistoricism," as Traub (2013) wittily describes this emergent work, asks whether the foundational focus of historicist inquiry on temporal succession is inherently problematic. Chronology, the argument goes, has bracketed out other, equally important connections among texts and contexts; as an alternative, queer theorists suggest that we be more "attentive to the recursive eddies and back-to-the-future loops that often pass undetected 28.…”
Section: Historicity and Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This does not privilege the "timeless" but produces instead a phenomenology of the historical, describing how we 29. For a defense against the charge that historicism is problematically teleological and a summary of how early modern studies have taken up the notion of queer temporality, see Traub 2013. experience historicity as we live in the present. As critics, mindfully detecting the past in the present might prevent us from unwittingly projecting the present into the past.…”
Section: Historicity and Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grounded in history and anthropology (Traub 2013), what follows reflects a wider, interdisciplinary investigation. In some ways, I return to the nineteenth-century sexologists for inspiration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debates about unhistoricism have been particularly vigorous and generative in queer studies. See Traub for an overview.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%