2017
DOI: 10.7833/116-1-1280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The New Testament as Political Documents

Abstract: The political nature of the NT documents is carefully hidden away in the folds of a centuries-long tradition of Christianising and spiritualising the NT (and the Bible overall). The depoliticisation and demilitarisation of the NT works hand in glove with a long history of its dejudaising and equally long ghettoising of the Bible through narrow spiritual interpretation, obscuring or blurring its socio-political nature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The re-reading of Mark 6:14-29 in the context of politically motivated violence in Zimbabwe has given us the opportunity to reflect on the dynamics between power and vulnerability. This article has also shown that Mark 6:14-29 confirms the view of Punt (2017) that the New Testament texts are politically loaded documents whose political narratives need to be studied in their proper context. Mark contrasts the power that Herod and Herodias wielded with that of the 'nameless' daughter of Herodias, such that the reader sympathises with the daughter who is presented as vulnerable in the face of the royal power.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The re-reading of Mark 6:14-29 in the context of politically motivated violence in Zimbabwe has given us the opportunity to reflect on the dynamics between power and vulnerability. This article has also shown that Mark 6:14-29 confirms the view of Punt (2017) that the New Testament texts are politically loaded documents whose political narratives need to be studied in their proper context. Mark contrasts the power that Herod and Herodias wielded with that of the 'nameless' daughter of Herodias, such that the reader sympathises with the daughter who is presented as vulnerable in the face of the royal power.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Exousia is opposed to charisma, which refers to grace or extraordinary powers freely given by God (e.g., the power to cast out demons). The study of Mark 6:14-29 is also in view of the argument by Punt (2017)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we need to dismantle the dichotomous social models for the Roman world that pervade biblical studies, especially when social analysis is tied to political exegesis directed more to modern theologizing against empire than historical reconstructions of ancient social structures, as in much postcolonial biblical scholarship (e.g., Elliott 2006; Taubes 2004; cf. Sugirtharaja 2006; Punt 2017, 2015; and, for a more qualified use of imperial language in Paul, see Harrill 2011). We need to be careful not to politicize Paul when a political perspective is not clearly present, as if we were anachronistically conflating Paul with Karl Marx or Martin Luther King, Jr – or perhaps imposing our modern postcolonial values about class conflict and political oppression onto the ancient world (cf.…”
Section: Reassessment Of Early Christian Socio-economic Analysis and mentioning
confidence: 99%