2014
DOI: 10.6018/analesps.30.3.166551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The new science of moral cognition: the state of the art. [La nueva ciencia de la cognición moral: estado de la cuestión]

Abstract: Título: La nueva ciencia de la cognición moral: estado de la cuestión. Resumen: La necesidad de realizar aproximaciones multidisciplinares al estudio de la naturaleza humana es ampliamente aceptada. Esta perspectiva se ha manifestado especialmente prolífica en el campo de la psicología moral. A pesar que el estudio de temas morales ha sido materia recurrente de las humanidades y de las ciencias sociales, solo la posterior integración de diferentes disciplinas científicas en la ciencia de la -psicología moral‖ … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence that erotic pictures presented in a suboptimal manner (but not other types of pleasant pictures) increase utilitarian moral judgments, which might be due to the erotic stimuli being more arousing [54]. Affective priming through disgusting pictures (depicting human mutilation) exclusively reduced the severity of moral judgments (with no effect on non-moral judgments [55]). The effect of disgust priming on moral judgments may be moderated by how sensitive the individual is to disgust: while disgusting pictures favoured utilitarian judgments in participants with higher disgust sensitivity, the same pictures favoured deontological judgments in participants with lower disgust sensitivity [56].…”
Section: Hypotheses (Required)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that erotic pictures presented in a suboptimal manner (but not other types of pleasant pictures) increase utilitarian moral judgments, which might be due to the erotic stimuli being more arousing [54]. Affective priming through disgusting pictures (depicting human mutilation) exclusively reduced the severity of moral judgments (with no effect on non-moral judgments [55]). The effect of disgust priming on moral judgments may be moderated by how sensitive the individual is to disgust: while disgusting pictures favoured utilitarian judgments in participants with higher disgust sensitivity, the same pictures favoured deontological judgments in participants with lower disgust sensitivity [56].…”
Section: Hypotheses (Required)mentioning
confidence: 99%