2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA®) in daily practice: Results of a multicentre clinical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

24
217
3
14

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 300 publications
(277 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
24
217
3
14
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an acceptable rate compared with other reports in the literature. 8,9 We did not find any cut-out or cutting through of the blade, unexpected blade migration and loosening of the blade. Implantrelated complications in proximal femoral fractures needing revision surgery, such as a cut-out of the implant through the femoral head, are reported to be as high as 16%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is an acceptable rate compared with other reports in the literature. 8,9 We did not find any cut-out or cutting through of the blade, unexpected blade migration and loosening of the blade. Implantrelated complications in proximal femoral fractures needing revision surgery, such as a cut-out of the implant through the femoral head, are reported to be as high as 16%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In this context, we have to note that the mean age of our study population was 84.5 years and these patients have many co-morbid conditions. [40][41][42][43] These co-morbidities influence the recovery of the patients 41 and compared with the literature, [7][8][9] this is a satisfying outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After 2000's proximal femoral nails have been revised and, because of their biomechanical advantages, preferred very commonly especially in the unstable hip fractures with medial calcar discontinuity. However studies reporting complications related with this technique started to come out with the common use of these implants (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Reported complications are cut-out, medial migration of the lag screw, perforation of the femoral head, malunion in varus position, nonunion, avascular necrosis, implant failure, neurovascular injuries and stress fracture distal to the nail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%