2015
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The New Portable Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Device Was Efficacious in the Control of Primary Dysmenorrhea Cramp Pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
62
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies adopted a variety of approaches, including the comparison of HF TENS versus placebo, 6,7,10,[17][18][19] low-frequency (LF) TENS versus placebo, 16,17,19,20 HF versus LF TENS, 17,19 and TENS versus medication. 3,5,18,19 One study lacked a placebo group and each participant was used as her own control.…”
Section: Design Of the Reviewed Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies adopted a variety of approaches, including the comparison of HF TENS versus placebo, 6,7,10,[17][18][19] low-frequency (LF) TENS versus placebo, 16,17,19,20 HF versus LF TENS, 17,19 and TENS versus medication. 3,5,18,19 One study lacked a placebo group and each participant was used as her own control.…”
Section: Design Of the Reviewed Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Another study compared HF TENS and interferential current. 9 The studies used parallel 6,7,9,16,17,20 or crossover designs. 3,8,10,18,19 Many previous trials were characterized by the lack of consistency with respect to the study design and homogeneity of the participants.…”
Section: Design Of the Reviewed Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Milsom et al 14 18 , que apresentaram um dispositivo portátil, aplicado na região suprapúbica em 40 voluntárias, por 30 minutos, com 8 horas de intervalo, durante 7 dias, com frequência de 85Hz e quatro possibilidades de nível de estimulação (1 -zero; 2 -10mA; 3 -20mA; 4 -30mA), e observaram alívio da dor, sem efeitos colaterais. Semelhante ao observado por Lee et al 19 com um eletroestimulador combinado com calor, para os quais os parâmetros eram frequência variável entre 100-110Hz por 10 minutos, seguido por termoterapia de 37 ou 40° (dependendo das preferências individuais) por 20 minutos.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified