The New Mega‐Projects: Genesis and Impacts

Abstract

Critiques of urban renewal and large-scale developments were prominent in the period 1960-80. In particular, they emphasized the negative environmental and social consequences of these schemes and especially attacked them for displacing low-income and ethnically different populations. In the 1980s and 1990s, we saw a decline in such projects in many places, responding to popular protest and intellectual dissent, along with a new emphasis on preservation. More recently, however, we see the revival of mega-projects, often connected with tourism and sports development and incorporating the designs of world-famous architects. Frequently these are on landfill or abandoned industrial sites. The symposium for which this is an introduction shows the growing convergence of North American and European projects. This convergence is visible in their physical form, their financing, and in the role played by the state in a world marked by neoliberalism. At the same time, the new projects do display a greater environmental sensitivity and commitment to urbanity than the modernist schemes of an earlier epoch. Copyright (c) 2009 The Authors. Journal Compilation (c) 2009 Joint Editors and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Power plants as megaprojects: Using empirics to shape policy, planning, and construction management

“…Looking at the operations phase, megaprojects are projects having long-term and far-reaching effects on their environment (Orueta and Fainstein 2008;Ren andWeinstein 2013, Warrack 1993) With respect to the economical dimension, Warrack (1985) argues that $1 billion is not a constraint in defining megaprojects, as sometimes a relative approach is needed because in some contexts, a much smaller project (such as one with a $100 million budget), could constitute a megaproject. Warrack (1993, p.13 This latter definition emphasizes the organizational complexity that comes with the presence of multiple private firms in connection to the political stakeholders (namely, the government).…”

State Dirigisme in Megaprojects: Governing the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi

“…This blurring also happens in numerous megaprojects in Western countries where public^private partnerships have become a popular form of cooperation between the state and private companies (D|¨az Orueta and Fainstein, 2008;Lehrer and Laidley, 2008). Public^private partnerships, however, are about ceding state control to the private sector in exchange for private investment.…”

Social Entrepreneurship in Urban Planning and Development in Montreal

“…While such community and non-governmental organisations have indeed been incorporated into governance arrangements and rhetoric on participation, nevertheless spatial planning and development under neoliberal hegemony has not been characterised by emancipation or inclusion of socially marginalised groups. Much of the literature shows how large-scale spatial projects, coordinated and implemented through planning interventions, have been used to manage people, and have reproduced power constellations and intensified social inequalities (Diaz Orueta & Fainstein, 2008;Lehrer & Laidley, 2008;Moulaert, Swyngedouw, & Rodriguez, 2003;Peck & Tickell, 2002). The inclusion of marginalised voices has not tended to be a priority in contemporary planning.…”