1988
DOI: 10.2307/1889657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The New Labor History and the Powers of Historical Pessimism: Consensus, Hegemony, and the Case of the Knights of Labor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If Andrew Carnegie was a captain of industry, the Knights of Labor was, as 'the largest and most representative labor body until its time -and probably the single largest unionizing movement in the Western World during the 1880s', 43 the captain of America's burgeoning organized labour movement. Membership was open to all workers: skilled, unskilled, women, immigrants, and even those sections of the middle class sympathetic to the cause.…”
Section: The Combatants: Carnegie and The Knightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If Andrew Carnegie was a captain of industry, the Knights of Labor was, as 'the largest and most representative labor body until its time -and probably the single largest unionizing movement in the Western World during the 1880s', 43 the captain of America's burgeoning organized labour movement. Membership was open to all workers: skilled, unskilled, women, immigrants, and even those sections of the middle class sympathetic to the cause.…”
Section: The Combatants: Carnegie and The Knightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historical interest in the KOL stems largely from their claim to be one of the few North American labor movements animated by truly collectivist and inclusivist principles (Ware 1959; Kealey and Palmer 1981, 1982; Fink 1983; Levine 1983; Fink 1988; Voss 1988; Conell and Voss 1990; Marks 1991; Voss 1993; Babb 1996; Voss 1996; Phelan 1999; Weir 2000; Kaufman 2001; Biggs 2002; Gerteis 2002; Biggs 2003). The KOL extended membership in the movement to all workers, including women and blacks; a notable exclusion to their inclusivist intentions were Chinese workers (Levine 1983; Gerteis 2002).…”
Section: Opportunity and Arbitration Framing: Producerism Hegemonic mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 1880s in particular, the KOL's forceful critique of the expanding power of industry and of government corruption reflected and articulated the discontent of many North American workers. The movement's creation of a counterhegemonic value system based on cooperation, equality, and social responsibility held great appeal for the economically vulnerable (Levine 1987;Kealey and Palmer 1982;Fink 1988). …”
Section: The Kolmentioning
confidence: 99%