The New International Health Regulations: Considerations for Global Public Health Surveillance

Abstract

Global public health surveillance is critical for the identification and prevention of emerging and reemerging infectious diseases. The World Health Organization recently released revised International Health Regulations (IHR) that serve as global legislation and provide guidelines for surveillance systems. The IHR aim to identify and prevent spread of these infectious diseases; however, there are some practical challenges that limit the usability of these regulations. IHR requires Member States to build necessary infrastructure for global surveillance, which may not be possible in underdeveloped countries. A large degree of freedom is given to each individual government and therefore different levels of reporting are common, with substantial emphasis on passive reporting. The IHR need to be enforceable and enforced without impinging on government autonomy or human rights. Unstable governments and developing countries require increased assistance in setting up and maintaining surveillance systems. This article addresses some challenges and potential solutions to the ability of national governments to adhere to the global health surveillance requirements detailed in the IHR. The authors review some practical challenges such as inadequate surveillance and reporting infrastructure, and legal enforcement and maintenance of individual human rights.

Ethical issues in public health surveillance: a systematic qualitative review

“…Furthermore, five papers focused on global public health surveillance, which actually included the low- and middle-income countries’ perspective [38–42]. However, the majority of articles focused on privacy in digitalized surveillance systems, which may be of greater importance in high-income countries.…”

Syndromic Surveillance and Patients as Victims and Vectors

“…The editors of PLoS Medicine, for example, point out that most of the investment in preparing for pandemic influenza has involved stockpiling resource in developed countries (PLoS Medicine Editors 2007). Other discussions praise the wider reach of the regulations about what are regarded as events of public health significance, but also express concern about whether the investment will be there to build the technical capacity for the required surveillance (Sturtevant et al 2007).…”

Best Practices for Implementing Electronic Disease Surveillance Systems in Resources-constrained Settings

“…The ability of these countries to detect such events allows an adequate response preventing its spread and reducing the morbidity and mortality of communities across the world [1]. …”