International Petroleum Technology Conference 2007
DOI: 10.2523/11672-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The New Interference Test: Reservoir Connectivity Information from Downhole Temperature Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Permanent bottom-hole pressure and temperature gauges are installed in all ACG wells to measure flowing bottom-hole temperature (FBHT), data from which is being used extensively for surveillance. These reveal water injectors that impact producers, interference among producers, and provide well performance diagnostics in ACG (Hutchinson et al, 2007). In [2006][2007], studies using Azeri 3D thermal simulation modelling was performed, which allowed confirmation of most of the processes and observations presented in this work.…”
Section: Re-allocation Of Gasmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Permanent bottom-hole pressure and temperature gauges are installed in all ACG wells to measure flowing bottom-hole temperature (FBHT), data from which is being used extensively for surveillance. These reveal water injectors that impact producers, interference among producers, and provide well performance diagnostics in ACG (Hutchinson et al, 2007). In [2006][2007], studies using Azeri 3D thermal simulation modelling was performed, which allowed confirmation of most of the processes and observations presented in this work.…”
Section: Re-allocation Of Gasmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Zhao et al [24] proposed the Interwell Numerical Simulation Model (INSIM), which has less computational effort than before and could be used as a calculation tool to obtain the reservoir performance under waterflooding conditions. The reservoir numerical simulation method can quantitatively evaluate the connectivity and its dynamic changes, but it is time-consuming and complex to build the model, although there are other types of methods to analyze interwell connectivity, such as 4D-seismic data method [25], bottom-hole-temperature data method [26], and neural network(NN) method [27]. Due to the high cost of seismic surveys, high requirements for temperature monitors, and tedious calculation steps of a neural network, these methods cannot perfectly solve the problems of the oil field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, well performance data along with pressure and later gas tracer data suggested Central Azeri (CA) gas injectors were infact also impacting the North Flank (NF) of East Azeri. The Bottom Hole Temperature (BHT) data from 4 EA producers closest to the CA sector showed decrease in BHT temperature of those wells nearest the gas injector once GI started-up ( Figure 6) (Hutchinson et al, 2007). It was noted that the injection rates into the closest water injectors and producers had remained relatively stable with no change in choke size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%