2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01703.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The new Ghent criteria for Marfan syndrome: what do they change?

Abstract: International audienceThe diagnosis of Marfan syndrome (MFS) is challenging and international criteria have been proposed. The 1996 Ghent criteria were adopted worldwide, but new diagnostic criteria for MFS were released in 2010, giving more weight to aortic root aneurysm and ectopia lentis. We aimed to compare the diagnosis reached by applying this new nosology vs the Ghent nosology in a well-known series of 1009 probands defined by the presence of an FBN1 mutation. A total of 842 patients could be classified… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
2
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
70
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The succession of classifications (Berlin, Ghent 1, and Ghent 2) illustrates the difficulty in diagnosis. [4][5][6][7] Although the phenotype in adults is becoming well documented, data in children are much rarer because of marked phenotypic variability both between and within families, and incomplete phenotype in the young, limiting effectiveness of familial screening in children in the absence of molecular biology. Therefore, child populations examined in earlier reports were possibly biased toward severe phenotypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The succession of classifications (Berlin, Ghent 1, and Ghent 2) illustrates the difficulty in diagnosis. [4][5][6][7] Although the phenotype in adults is becoming well documented, data in children are much rarer because of marked phenotypic variability both between and within families, and incomplete phenotype in the young, limiting effectiveness of familial screening in children in the absence of molecular biology. Therefore, child populations examined in earlier reports were possibly biased toward severe phenotypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 MVP is considered the most common primary valvular abnormality in young populations (prevalence 2% to 5%), 16,17 and it is often associated with heritable connective tissue disorders. 4,15,18 It is usually a benign asymptomatic condition, although it is also related to a confusing array of seemingly unrelated symptoms of dysautonomia that cannot be explained on the basis of mitral regurgitation alone, such as palpitations, orthostatic hypotension, syncope fatigue-exercise intolerance, chest pain, shortness of breath, and panic attacks, which are collectively called MVP syndrome. 17,18 Moreover, inferior ECG lead abnormalities may occasionally be found, as well as typically early repolarization patterns and ST-segment depression or T-wave inversion, mimicking myocardial ischemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, because of the evolving nature of some clinical manifestations of Marfan syndrome, classic signs are rarely present in younger children and usually appear as the disease progresses over time. 4 Second, the broad spectrum of type 1 fibrillinopathies, as well as the wide clinical heterogeneity among individuals and families affected with the same mutation, result in a challenging phenotypic-genotypic correlation. 8,9 Furthermore, extensive phenotypic overlapping is observed in the general population, with high prevalence of MVP or skeletal marfanoid disorders 10,11 and so-called MM conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…До-стоинства и ограничения пересмотренной версии Гент-ских критериев продолжают обсуждаться. Сравнение диагностической ценности новых и старых Гентских критериев у пациентов с подтвержденной мутацией гена FBN1 показало их сопоставимость [10]. Вместе с тем возможна гиподиагностика патологии из-за недо-оценки значения эктазии твердой мозговой оболочки и дилатации аорты у пациентов с высоким показателем площади поверхности тела [11].…”
Section: синдром марфанаunclassified