2019
DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjz043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The New Frontier: A Review of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Plastic Surgery

Abstract: Mixed reality, a blending of the physical and digital worlds, can enhance the surgical experience, leading to greater precision, efficiency, and improved outcomes. Various studies across different disciplines have reported encouraging results using mixed reality technologies, such as augmented and virtual reality. To provide a better understanding of the applications and limitations of this technology in plastic surgery, we performed a systematic review of the literature in accordance with Preferred Reporting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Most of the studies exploring the use of AR in reconstructive microsurgery employ head-mounted devices or monitors to superimpose anatomical data onto the operative site. However, as has been reported elsewhere, 6 the limitations of these technologies include reduced range of motion, lack of interference with the surgical AR-generated models from CTA scans can be used in reconstructive surgeries. The HoloLens demonstrated to be a useful tool that may reduce anesthetic time and morbidity associated with surgery and improve training and provide remote support for the operating surgeon Abbreviations: ALT, anterior lateral thigh; AR, augmented reality; CT, computerized tomography; DIEP, deep inferior epigastric perforator; DIRT, dynamic infrared thermography; LD, latissimus dorsi; NR, not reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 Most of the studies exploring the use of AR in reconstructive microsurgery employ head-mounted devices or monitors to superimpose anatomical data onto the operative site. However, as has been reported elsewhere, 6 the limitations of these technologies include reduced range of motion, lack of interference with the surgical AR-generated models from CTA scans can be used in reconstructive surgeries. The HoloLens demonstrated to be a useful tool that may reduce anesthetic time and morbidity associated with surgery and improve training and provide remote support for the operating surgeon Abbreviations: ALT, anterior lateral thigh; AR, augmented reality; CT, computerized tomography; DIEP, deep inferior epigastric perforator; DIRT, dynamic infrared thermography; LD, latissimus dorsi; NR, not reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…5 Sayadi et al reviewed the use of AR and virtual reality (VR) in plastic surgery, but there remained a paucity of reconstructive microsurgery research articles in their review and their literature search was limited to one database. 6 Consequently, there has yet to be a systematic review that has comprehensively evaluated the use of AR in reconstructive surgery. With the increased use of AR in surgery year upon year (►Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This simulates a Virtual Reality rehab setting by having subjects perform repeated goal-directed wrist/hand reaching tasks. Subjects held a cupshaped color-marker in the paretic hand and, reach out for a virtual fruit target in this study [18].…”
Section: Haptic Based Devices and 3d Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VR is touted for its ability to provide rare and complex experiences that are not often encountered in the day-to-day setting. 15 , 16 Many VR programs focus on improving identification of anatomic variation and evaluating procedural knowledge. The drawbacks of VR are its expensive up-front costs and its inability to fully capture the physical aspects of surgery because of its lack of high-quality haptic feedback.…”
Section: Simulation Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawbacks of VR are its expensive up-front costs and its inability to fully capture the physical aspects of surgery because of its lack of high-quality haptic feedback. 15 , 16 …”
Section: Simulation Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%