2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3364-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The new FIGO staging system for ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer

Abstract: The new FIGO classification takes into account the recent findings on the origin, pathogenesis, and prognosis of different ovarian cancer subtypes, summarizes groups of tumors pragmatically, and implies a reproducible and stage-dependent therapeutical approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
120
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the histological types, we adopted the World Health Organization (WHO) classification criteria. The clinical stage was assigned according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system (15,16).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the histological types, we adopted the World Health Organization (WHO) classification criteria. The clinical stage was assigned according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system (15,16).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lymphatic metastasis is an important malignant progression factor in ovarian carcinoma (40,41). In advanced disease (FIGO stages III-IV) particularly, nodal metastases to the pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes are common (25). SASH1 expression in ovarian carcinoma tissues from patients with lymph nodes metastases was significantly lower than that in ovarian carcinoma tissues with negative lymph nodes metastases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All tumor tissue and the adjacent normal ovarian tissue from 79 ovarian carcinoma cases were pathologically verified by the Department of Pathology of the Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Nantong. The clinicopathological characteristics of 79 ovarian patients were collected, including age at diagnosis, FIGO stage (25), histological type, and lymph node status. Histological type was classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (26).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All specimens were used in the present study after obtaining written informed consent from the patients, and ethical approval was provided by the Ethics Review Board of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University. According to the 2010 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading system (14), tumor histological grade was classified as poorly-differentiated (grade 3; 11/80 patients), moderately-differentiated (grade 2; 20/80 patients) or well-differentiated (grade 1; 49/80 patients). Surgical staging was reviewed based on the FIGO staging system as follows: 9 patients were allocated to stage I, 20 patients to stage II, 33 patients to stage III and 18 patients to stage IV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%