2017
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/aa6dcc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ‘neutron deficit’ in the JET tokamak

Abstract: The measured D-D neutron rate of neutral beam heated JET baseline and hybrid H-modes in deuterium is found to be between approximately 50% and 100% of the neutron rate expected from the TRANSP code, depending on the plasma parameters. A number of candidate explanations for the shortfall, such as fuel dilution, errors in beam penetration and effectively available beam power have been excluded. As the neutron rate in JET is dominated by beamplasma interactions, the 'neutron deficit' may be caused by a yet uniden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
49
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
49
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results provide further evidence that the T i profile from JETTO + QuaLiKiz is underpredicted, as the neutron rates using the simulated profiles consistently fall under the measured neutron rate, though still within the ± 2σ uncertainty ranges for pure Ni. These results are consistent with previous works on this matter [29] and accentuate the importance of reliable impurity composition and profile estimations for any extrapolation exercises, due to the impact of fuel dilution on the total fusion rate.…”
Section: Validation Of the Nominal Settingssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results provide further evidence that the T i profile from JETTO + QuaLiKiz is underpredicted, as the neutron rates using the simulated profiles consistently fall under the measured neutron rate, though still within the ± 2σ uncertainty ranges for pure Ni. These results are consistent with previous works on this matter [29] and accentuate the importance of reliable impurity composition and profile estimations for any extrapolation exercises, due to the impact of fuel dilution on the total fusion rate.…”
Section: Validation Of the Nominal Settingssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Simulations were repeated using the EFIT equilibrium to quantify errors due to profile fitting, this only changed the modelled neutron rate by ∼ 3%. These neutron discrepancies are small compared to those reported in [19] but it should be noted that the diagnostics used to produce the total neutron rate on JET have recently been recalibrated resulting in an increase in the measured neutron rate and, typically, a decrease in the discrepancy with respect to simulations.…”
Section: Isotope Ratio Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The answer is given in table 2. Note that although this calculation is rough, it does not rely on the absolute neutron calibration and should be insensitive to the "neutron deficit" -mismatch between predicted by TRANSP and measured neutrons sometimes observed in JET plasma simulations [15] Pulse number 91232 91227 nD/(nD+nH) edge -measured 0.14 0.67 nH/(nD+nH) edge -measured 0.86 0.33 nD/(nD+nH) core -derived 0.157 0.676 nH/(nD+nH) core -derived 0.843 0.324 Table 2: measured and calculated edge and core D/H isotope concentrations.…”
Section: Figure 2 Illustration Of Possible H/d Isotope Profiles Withmentioning
confidence: 99%