1966
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5582(66)90969-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neutron cross sections of thorium and the analysis of the resonances up to 1 keV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For such large values of ν γ , a χ 2 distribution is very close to Gaussian in shape. One advantage of using a Gaussian rather than χ 2 distribution for the analysis is that data uncertainties ∆Γ γ can easily be included [27].…”
Section: Testing the Ptd With γ γ Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such large values of ν γ , a χ 2 distribution is very close to Gaussian in shape. One advantage of using a Gaussian rather than χ 2 distribution for the analysis is that data uncertainties ∆Γ γ can easily be included [27].…”
Section: Testing the Ptd With γ γ Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 m diameter) and consists of a lami- reject the gamma-ray background. The Harwell five-glass scattering detector was used with a resolution of 5 nsec/m (Asghar et al, 1966a). 9) at a distance of 50 m from the neutron source.…”
Section: Values Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9) at a distance of 50 m from the neutron source. These Th data have been combined with trans mission and capture measurements to determine the resonance parameters and resonance integral of Th (Asghar et at., 1966a). in diameter by f in.…”
Section: Values Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such large values of ν γ , a χ 2 distribution is very close to Gaussian in shape. One advantage of using a Gaussian rather than χ 2 distribution for the analysis is that uncertainties ∆Γ γ can easily be included [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] to estimate most likely values for the means Γ γ and standard deviations σ N of the Γ γ distributions in the two energy regions. Resulting ML estimates are σ N = 4.67 ± 0.81, Γ γ = 52.0 ± 1.1, and σ N = 11.7 ± 1.5, Γ γ = 59.6 ± 2.0, for the lower-and upper-energy regions, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%