1974
DOI: 10.1172/jci107549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neurogenic Vasoconstrictor Effect of Digitalis on Coronary Vascular Resistance

Abstract: A B S T R A C T The coronary vasoconstrictor properties of digitalis were evaluated in 61 anesthetized, openchest dogs after coronary sinus cannulation and under conditions of a constant heart rate (atrioventricular pacing) and near-constant blood pressure. The contribution of alpha adrenergic receptor stimulation to the digitalisinduced increase in coronary vascular resistance (CVR) was examined. With Na pentobarbital anesthesia (16 dogs), intravenous acetylstrophanthidin (0.5 mg) caused a significant (P < 0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of occlusion and subsequent propranolol were not significantly different in these animals from the changes observed in dogs subsequently treated with ouabain. However, there were important differences following ouabain from the propranololocclusion baseline which are covered in detail above in 15 17 that the increase in flow was not a spontaneous occurrence over this time period of coronary occlusion, since nontreated control dogs did not demonstrate a further increase in flow after propranolol (table 2). There are several mechanisms which could be responsible for the improvement in blood flow.…”
Section: Control Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The effects of occlusion and subsequent propranolol were not significantly different in these animals from the changes observed in dogs subsequently treated with ouabain. However, there were important differences following ouabain from the propranololocclusion baseline which are covered in detail above in 15 17 that the increase in flow was not a spontaneous occurrence over this time period of coronary occlusion, since nontreated control dogs did not demonstrate a further increase in flow after propranolol (table 2). There are several mechanisms which could be responsible for the improvement in blood flow.…”
Section: Control Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nerve recordings, however, have provided evidence that the digitalis glycosides exert significant effects on the afferent and efferent autonomic nervous system (5)(6)(7). Recent studies in our laboratory have demonstrated that the greatest portion of digoxin-induced coronary vasoconstriction and of acetylstrophanthidin-induced vasoconstriction in skeletal muscle is neurogenically mediated and occurs through stimulation of alpha adrenergic receptors (8,9). This effect appears to be due to the action of digitalis at or proximal to the sympathetic ganglia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elevation of transhepatic resistance is primarily mediated through stimulation of alpha adrenergic receptors, Similarly, stimulation of alpha receptors is the major mechanism whereby intravenous digitalis administration elevates arterial vascular resistance as noted in Figs. 2 and 3 and our previous work (9)(10)(11). The work by Garan et al (12) suggests that the central nervous system is the site of action of the increase in arterial resistance after digitalis administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Cotten and Stopp (2) studied the effects of the gly-coside ouabain on peripheral capacity in dogs. They hypothesized increases in intravascular volume in the splanchnic vasculature within 10 min of the administration of ouabain based on findings of diminished venous return associated with a decrease in left and right atrial pressures; however, they did not make observations beyond 10 min after drug administration. Furthermore, they did not directly assess the effects of the drug on total vascular capacity, nor did they investigate whether changes in transhepatic resistance might influence splanchnic and total intravascular volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%