The Neuroethics and Neurolaw of Brain Injury

Abstract

Neuroethics and neurolaw are fields of study that involve the interface of neuroscience with clinical and legal decision-making. The past two decades have seen increasing attention being paid to both fields, in large part because of the advances in neuroimaging techniques and improved ability to visualize and measure brain structure and function. Traumatic brain injury (TBI), along with its acute and chronic sequelae, has emerged as a focus of neuroethical issues, such as informed consent for treatment and research, diagnostic and prognostic uncertainties, and the subjectivity of interpretation of data. The law has also more frequently considered TBI in criminal settings for exculpation, mitigation and sentencing purposes and in tort and administrative law for personal injury, disability and worker's compensation cases. This article provides an overview of these topics with an emphasis on the current challenges that the neuroscience of TBI faces in the medicolegal arena.

Neuroethics and neurolaw in forensic neuropsychiatry: A guide for clinicians

“…In the adversarial U.S. legal system, such medical evidence must be translated into relevant information that judges and juries can use to make legal determinations (Taylor & Buchanan, 1998). Whether neuroscience is accepted or excluded as legal evidence is often based on the type of technology (e.g., psychological testing, functional neuroimaging), its probative value (the ability to assist the trier of fact in identifying the truth), and the particular jurisdiction's evidentiary standards (Aggarwal & Ford, 2013).…”

Neuroethics: A Moral Approach towards Neuroscience Research

“…Ethical problems emerging from neuroscience research and clinincal neurology have led to the development of a new discipline termed "Neuroethics". Neuroethics takes into account ethico-legal and socio-moral norms when performing basic science and clinical research in the field of neuroscience (1). There seems to be a tremendous increase in interest in the ethics of neuroscience as evidenced by numerous meetings, publications and organizations devoted to this area.…”