The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Forensic Neuroscience 2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781118650868.ch16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neurobiology of Offending Behavior in Adolescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, delinquency is an umbrella term for a diverse set of behaviors and it will be important to determine whether some behaviors are particularly well or poorly described by the model in the current study, i.e., involving subgroups with and without a developmental imbalance between sensationseeking and self-regulation. For example, distinctions are often made between aggressive and non-aggressive conduct problems and between reactive and instrumental aggression (Fairchild and Smaragdi 2018). It is possible that more impulsive and emotionally-hot forms of delinquency (e.g., reactive aggression) are better accounted for by the models of the current study (see e.g., Lickley and Sebastian 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, delinquency is an umbrella term for a diverse set of behaviors and it will be important to determine whether some behaviors are particularly well or poorly described by the model in the current study, i.e., involving subgroups with and without a developmental imbalance between sensationseeking and self-regulation. For example, distinctions are often made between aggressive and non-aggressive conduct problems and between reactive and instrumental aggression (Fairchild and Smaragdi 2018). It is possible that more impulsive and emotionally-hot forms of delinquency (e.g., reactive aggression) are better accounted for by the models of the current study (see e.g., Lickley and Sebastian 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The fact that two different temporal and frontal regions are involved, rather than being restricted to the frontal cortex, suggests that brain structure features in juvenile offenders may be more widespread than originally thought (Fairchild et al, 2016). With respect to the direction of the effects, cortical thinning in the superior temporal gyrus has usually been found in adolescents, youths, and adults with conduct problems and antisocial behavior (Fairchild & Smaragdi, 2018). However, in support of our finding of a thicker cortex in the superior temporal gyrus, similar measures of the middle temporal gyrus and inferior temporal gyrus have also been found in male adolescents showing increases in the psychopathic tendency from ages 9 to 18 (Yang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies in youths with conduct problems related to controls reported smaller grey matter volume in the ventromedial, orbitofrontal, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior and posterior cingulate cortex, and temporal cortex regions supporting executive function, motivation, and affect regulation (see metaanalysis by Rogers & De Brito, 2016). A review of cross-sectional studies in adolescents with conduct disorders reported lower cortical thickness in the right superior temporal gyrus, reduced surface area in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and increased cortical folding in the insula relative to healthy controls (Fairchild & Smaragdi, 2018). However, cortical thinning is not always the tendency, since individual rates of change in psychopathic tendency from ages 9 to 18 have been correlated with thicker cortex measurements in the superior temporal gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, inferior temporal gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, and posterior cingulate gyrus, particularly in males (Yang et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the statistical methods and results extracted from the Sharp (2008) and Ackermann et al, (2019) studies, an alternative hypothesis (H 1 ) is proposed for determining the presence of a difference in score averages ≥3 points among men and women for the direct and indirect measures of cognitive/emotional empathy, and a priori expected standard deviations of ±3 for both genders. Sample size calculation for comparing two means was performed in OpenEpi, (The OpenEpi Project, Georgia USA), pointing out that at least 43 subjects (26 females and 17 males) are required when defining a 97.5% confidence interval with a power of 80%, and assuming an minimum allocation rate by gender of 1.5:1 supported by the higher prevalence of conduct disorder in males (Fairchild & Smaragdi, 2018). A difference-of-two-means hypothesis is proposed because this is the central tendency measure reported by the aforementioned authors; nonetheless, statistical analysis in this paper is conditioned to sampling distribution of the data.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%