2004
DOI: 10.3758/cabn.4.1.67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neurobiology of adaptive learning in reading: A contrast of different training conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
106
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
12
106
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The left temporoparietal region of the brain is known to be crucial for the integration of letter and speech sounds (68) and has consistently demonstrated activation during phonological processing tasks in typically reading children and adults (for reviews, see refs. [40][41][42]. In individuals with DD, a hypoactivation of the left temporoparietal region of the brain seems to reflect an inability to map the sounds of languages (phonemes) to its written counterparts (letters/graphemes) (44,(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The left temporoparietal region of the brain is known to be crucial for the integration of letter and speech sounds (68) and has consistently demonstrated activation during phonological processing tasks in typically reading children and adults (for reviews, see refs. [40][41][42]. In individuals with DD, a hypoactivation of the left temporoparietal region of the brain seems to reflect an inability to map the sounds of languages (phonemes) to its written counterparts (letters/graphemes) (44,(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The left hemispheric occipitotemporal region seems to be involved in the processing of words or pseudowords in typical reading children and adults (for reviews, see refs. [40][41][42] and has been called the "visual word form area" (69). Several studies suggest that within this region, letters are represented and processed independently of the perceptual dimension of stimulus presentation (69)(70)(71).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Functional imaging studies on phonological processing reported activation in different subsystems of the reading system (Richlan et al, 2009;Sandak et al, 2004) such as the the left hemispheric brain regions including inferior frontal cortical areas (Bles and Jansma, 2008;Booth et al, 2007;Cao et al, 2006;Hoeft et al, 2006;Shaywitz and Shaywitz, 2005) in tasks involving effortful selection, retrieval or manipulation of phonological representations (Fiebach et al, 2002;Fiez et al, 1999), subvocal articulatory rehearsal (Smith and Jonides, 1998) or the pronounceability of print (Frost et al, 2009). Also, temporoparietal regions including the superior temporal, supramarginal and angular gyri as well as occipitotemporal areas have been associated with phonological processes (Church et al, 2008;Paulesu et al, 1993;Pugh et al, 1996;Rumsey et al, 1997;Shaywitz and Shaywitz, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we know that learning to read entails a substantial reorganization of the brain (Carreiras et al 2009 Neuroimaging research has shown a differential involvement of dorsal and ventral routes in reading processes in studies with monolingual samples (Pugh et al 2001;Schlaggar and McCandliss 2007). Whereas the dorsal pathway, encompassing parietal lobe, superior temporal gyrus (STG) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) pars opercularis, is thought to subserve phonological processing, the ventral pathway, including vOT and anterior IFG regions (i.e., pars triangularis and pars obitalis), supports mapping of orthographic-lexical stimuli onto semantic representations (Sandak et al 2004). These findings have also been bolstered by studies looking at white-matter pathways (Saur et al 2008;Rolheiser et al 2011;Friederici, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%