1987
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.50.2.183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neurobehavioural rating scale: assessment of the behavioural sequelae of head injury by the clinician.

Abstract: SUMMARY To investigate the inter-rater reliability and validity of the Neurobehavioural Rating Scale at various stages of recovery after hospitalisation for closed head injury, we studied 101 head trauma patients who had no antecedent neuropsychiatric disorder. The results demonstrated satisfactory inter-rater reliability and showed that the Neurobehavioural Rating Scale reflects both the severity and chronicity of closed head injury. A principal components analysis revealed four factors which were differentia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
197
1
9

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 450 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(3 reference statements)
2
197
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with brain damage to more than one region were classified based on the region with the greatest percentage of brain damage (Gozzi et al, 2009). We used this procedure to guarantee that patients in a lesion group not only had brain damage to that region, but also had greater brain damage to that region than to the other regions under investigation (Mah et al, 2004). In addition, patients with brain damage Ͼ15% in more than one region or whose damage was Ͻ15% were excluded from this confirmatory analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients with brain damage to more than one region were classified based on the region with the greatest percentage of brain damage (Gozzi et al, 2009). We used this procedure to guarantee that patients in a lesion group not only had brain damage to that region, but also had greater brain damage to that region than to the other regions under investigation (Mah et al, 2004). In addition, patients with brain damage Ͼ15% in more than one region or whose damage was Ͻ15% were excluded from this confirmatory analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Analysis of Brain Lesion (ABLe) software version 2.8b (Makale et al, 2002;Solomon et al, 2007) implemented in MEDx (Medical Numerics) version 3.44, we calculated lesion location and volume loss. To identify the location of each lesion, a neuropsychiatrist (V.R.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of rating scales have been developed for the identification of psychotic symptoms in AD, and scoring of their severity. 9,[14][15][16] When interrater reliability for measuring the severity of individual psychotic symptoms on these scales has been assessed, it has generally been high. 9,16,17 In contrast, little data are available to inform whether a classification of an individual as having AD þ P can be achieved reliably.…”
Section: Evidence For a Distinct Phenotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While deficits in cognitive ability increase as a function of injury severity, [1][2][3][4] episodes of depression and anxiety are as prevalent after mild TBI as they are after moderate/severe TBI. [1][2][3][4] Temporary amnesia, headaches, and sleep disorders are also common, even after a mild TBI. The etiology of such diverse symptomology is unknown; however, the loss of excitatory synapses may explain the appearance of some of these symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%