2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00017-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neural response to emotional prosody, as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
156
2
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 295 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
17
156
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The left IFC thus might also decode emotional cues from nonspeech vocalizations, indicating that left IFC activity is not exclusive to syntacto-semantic speech processing, but serves more general functions during the processing of human utterances. Finally, although the IFC has been proposed to be involved in the explicit decoding of emotional prosody when attention is directed to the emotional cues in voices, IFC activity has also been found when attention is directed away from emotional cues in voices (Belin et al, 2008a;Fecteau et al, 2005;Morris et al, 1999;Wildgruber et al, 2004Wildgruber et al, , 2005 or during passive listening (Mitchell et al, 2003). This contradicts some proposals that the IFC is predominantly involved in the explicit evaluation of emotional voices or when attention is directly focused on the emotional value of voices (Bruck et al, 2011;Schirmer and Kotz, 2006;Wildgruber et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The left IFC thus might also decode emotional cues from nonspeech vocalizations, indicating that left IFC activity is not exclusive to syntacto-semantic speech processing, but serves more general functions during the processing of human utterances. Finally, although the IFC has been proposed to be involved in the explicit decoding of emotional prosody when attention is directed to the emotional cues in voices, IFC activity has also been found when attention is directed away from emotional cues in voices (Belin et al, 2008a;Fecteau et al, 2005;Morris et al, 1999;Wildgruber et al, 2004Wildgruber et al, , 2005 or during passive listening (Mitchell et al, 2003). This contradicts some proposals that the IFC is predominantly involved in the explicit evaluation of emotional voices or when attention is directly focused on the emotional value of voices (Bruck et al, 2011;Schirmer and Kotz, 2006;Wildgruber et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Recent neuroimaging studies found several right IFC peak activations distributed from the posterior to the anterior IFC located in BA 44 Kotz et al, 2003), BA 45 (Bach et al, 2008;Beaucousin et al, 2007;Ethofer et al, 2006;Sander et al, 2005), and BA 47 (Bach et al, 2008;Beaucousin et al, 2007;Belin et al, 2008a;Ethofer et al, 2009;Mitchell, 2006;Sander et al, 2005), as well as in the fOP Kotz et al, 2003;Mitchell et al, 2003;Schirmer et al, 2004) (see Fig. 2).…”
Section: The Functional Role Of the Ifc In Processing Emotional Vocalmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consensus suggests a right hemisphere advantage for emotional (non-semantic) aspects of language and prosody (Mitchell and Crow, 2005), particularly in the right STS and MTG, whereas more semantic aspects of language recruit more left-sided regions (Mitchell et al, 2003). This hemispheric pattern has been seen using fMRI (Mitchell et al, 2003) (Wildgruber et al, 2005), transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (Vingerhoets et al, 2003), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (van Rijin et al, 2005), event-related potential (Eckstein and Friederici, 2005), and in lesion studies (Pell, 2006). Therefore, it is possible, that the tone processing impairment on the right in the SPD subjects is related to non-semantic aspects of their odd speech.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%