2016
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neural networks of subjectively evaluated emotional conflicts

Abstract: Previous work on the neural underpinnings of emotional conflict processing has largely focused on designs that instruct participants to ignore a distracter which conflicts with a target. In contrast, this study investigated the noninstructed experience and evaluation of an emotional conflict, where positive or negative cues can be subjectively prioritized. To this end, healthy participants freely watched short film scenes that evoked emotional conflicts while their BOLD responses were measured. Participants' i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(132 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that, surprisingly, the participants reporting EM were better at downregulating their negative mood, they could be expected to also experience less distress and hence show less amygdalar activation ( 49 ). The reduction in functional connectivity between the amygdala and the inferior parietal cortex involved in evaluating emotional conflict (when displayed emotions do not correspond to the context) ( 79 ) might also increase the efficiency of emotion regulation during negative mood induction by reducing the conflicting informational stream.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that, surprisingly, the participants reporting EM were better at downregulating their negative mood, they could be expected to also experience less distress and hence show less amygdalar activation ( 49 ). The reduction in functional connectivity between the amygdala and the inferior parietal cortex involved in evaluating emotional conflict (when displayed emotions do not correspond to the context) ( 79 ) might also increase the efficiency of emotion regulation during negative mood induction by reducing the conflicting informational stream.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though few studies have assessed attention-related trait dimensions across both TD children and children with NDDs, colleagues (2014, 2016) Goldfarb, et al, 2016;Rohr, et al, 2015;Rohr, et al, 2013;Rohr, et al, 2016;Vossel, et al, 2016) and clinical groups (Nebel, et al, 2015;van Dongen, et al, 2015;. The use of dimensional approaches can also allow for more statistical power in studies on ADHD and ASD, which are chronically underpowered due to heterogeneity in the populations studied (Fair, et al, 2012;Nigg, 2005;Sonuga-Barke, 2002;Sonuga-Barke, et al, 2008) and the challenge of recruiting and successfully collecting neuroimaging data from these groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet cognitive engagement with the stimuli is somewhat problematic as such stimuli can alter one's emotional experience. For example we have shown elsewhere (Naor, Shamay-Tsoory, Sheppes, & Okon-Singer, 2017) that asking participants to engage cognitively with an empathy-evoking task reduces, and can even eliminate, the overall effect of empathy (see also related findings ofHutcherson, Goldin, Ochsner, Gabrieli, Barrett, Gross 2005;and Rohr et al, 2016 regarding the impact of rating on felt emotions).…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%