The neural mobilization technique modulates the expression of endogenous opioids in the periaqueductal gray and improves muscle strength and mobility in rats with neuropathic pain
Abstract:BackgroundThe neural mobilization (NM) technique is a noninvasive method that has been proven to be clinically effective in reducing pain; however, the molecular mechanisms involved remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to analyze whether NM alters the expression of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR), the delta-opioid receptor (DOR) and the Kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) in the periaqueductal gray (PAG) and improves locomotion and muscle force after chronic constriction injury (CCI) in rats.MethodsThe CCI… Show more
“…(5) NM demonstrated efficiency in prevention of hypertrophy, muscular strength gains, improved nerve conduction velocity and reduction of pain in animals. (6,7) Whereas in humans were evidenced gains of flexibility and range of motion, pain relief, increase in the recruitment of muscle fibers, improve in neural conduction velocity, increase in the muscle strength and improve in the functionality. (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13) Although the explored studies have shown positive results, researchers still have antagonistic thoughts regarding the clinical applicability of NM.…”
Introduction: The neural mobilization is a technique aimed at functional recovery of the nervous system and structures innervated by it. However, little is known about its effects in patients affected by stroke (CVA). Objective: To review and integrate studies that investigated the effects of neural mobilization (NM) in the treatment of patients with stroke. Method: an integrative review of scientific studies with primary and secondary data, both addressing the NM in the treatment of spasticity, flexibility and functionality of stroke patients. The review was carried out by independent authors from July to October 2014. databases were consulted: LILACS, PEDRO, PUBMED and SCIELO. For the selection of manuscripts, we used the following key words: Neural Mobilization, Neurodynamics Mobilization, neurodynamic tests, stroke, spasticity Muscle, joint range of motion, flexibility and their counterparts in English. Studies were screened by reading the titles and objectives. Then deleted resumes in duplicate and performed the reading of articles to verify that met the inclusion criteria. Results: Six studies were selected, one being reviewed. In general, all the research has investigated the effects of NM in stroke patients. Four of the six articles were published in English. Only one study used a control group. As for treatment, there was divergence in relation to the NM application protocol. Conclusion: The reviewed studies indicate beneficial effects of neural mobilization in the control of muscle tone, range of motion and functionality of patients affected by stroke.
“…(5) NM demonstrated efficiency in prevention of hypertrophy, muscular strength gains, improved nerve conduction velocity and reduction of pain in animals. (6,7) Whereas in humans were evidenced gains of flexibility and range of motion, pain relief, increase in the recruitment of muscle fibers, improve in neural conduction velocity, increase in the muscle strength and improve in the functionality. (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13) Although the explored studies have shown positive results, researchers still have antagonistic thoughts regarding the clinical applicability of NM.…”
Introduction: The neural mobilization is a technique aimed at functional recovery of the nervous system and structures innervated by it. However, little is known about its effects in patients affected by stroke (CVA). Objective: To review and integrate studies that investigated the effects of neural mobilization (NM) in the treatment of patients with stroke. Method: an integrative review of scientific studies with primary and secondary data, both addressing the NM in the treatment of spasticity, flexibility and functionality of stroke patients. The review was carried out by independent authors from July to October 2014. databases were consulted: LILACS, PEDRO, PUBMED and SCIELO. For the selection of manuscripts, we used the following key words: Neural Mobilization, Neurodynamics Mobilization, neurodynamic tests, stroke, spasticity Muscle, joint range of motion, flexibility and their counterparts in English. Studies were screened by reading the titles and objectives. Then deleted resumes in duplicate and performed the reading of articles to verify that met the inclusion criteria. Results: Six studies were selected, one being reviewed. In general, all the research has investigated the effects of NM in stroke patients. Four of the six articles were published in English. Only one study used a control group. As for treatment, there was divergence in relation to the NM application protocol. Conclusion: The reviewed studies indicate beneficial effects of neural mobilization in the control of muscle tone, range of motion and functionality of patients affected by stroke.
“…Exercise and other forms of physical therapy are approved therapeutic treatment strategies in the rehabilitation of patients suffering from chronic pain including low back pain (Heneweer et al, 2009;Hooten et al, 2012;Babatunde et al, 2017;Geneen et al, 2017). Physical therapy reduces pain reactions in animals (Cobianchi et al, 2010;Shen et al, 2013;Sluka et al, 2013;Santos et al, 2014;Lima et al, 2017) and pain in humans (Naugle et al, 2012;Babatunde et al, 2017).…”
Physical exercise is a common treatment for low back pain. The possible mechanisms underlying the effects of exercise are probably multifold. This work shows that swimming exercise prevents sensitization of dorsal horn neurons, which may be one mechanism for the positive effects of exercise.
“…Utilizing male Wistar rats and Western blot assays of the PAG, Santos et al (2014) examined the brains of rats following neural mobilization for mu-, delta-, and kappa-opioid receptor expression. Researchers did not find changes in delta-and mu-opioid receptor expression following neural mobilization, but kappa-opioid receptor expression underwent a significant increase, by 17%.…”
Manual therapy has long been a component of physical rehabilitation programs, especially to treat those in pain. The mechanisms of manual therapy, however, are not fully understood, and it has been suggested that its pain modulatory effects are of neurophysiological origin, and may be mediated by the descending modulatory circuit. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to examine the neurophysiological response of different types of manual therapy, in order to better understand the neurophysiological mechanisms behind each therapy’s analgesic effects. It is concluded that different forms of manual therapy elicit analgesic effects via different mechanisms. Additionally, future avenues of mechanistic research pertaining to manual therapy are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.